mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting and Advancing Adversarial Training Through A Simple Baseline

arXiv 2306.07613 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we delve into the essential components of adversarial training which is a pioneering defense technique against adversarial attacks. We indicate that some factors such as the loss function, learning rate scheduler, and data augmentation, which are independent of the model architecture, will influence adversarial robustness and generalization. When these factors are controlled for, we introduce a simple baseline approach, termed SimpleAT, that performs competitively with recent methods and mitigates robust overfitting. We conduct extensive experiments on CIFAR-10/100 and Tiny-ImageNet, which validate the robustness of SimpleAT against state-of-the-art adversarial attackers such as AutoAttack. Our results also demonstrate that SimpleAT exhibits good performance in the presence of various image corruptions, such as those found in the CIFAR-10-C. In addition, we empirically show that SimpleAT is capable of reducing the variance in model predictions, which is considered the primary contributor to robust overfitting. Our results also reveal the connections between SimpleAT and many advanced state-of-the-art adversarial defense methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

57 of 67 references.

References · 57

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  8. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  9. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  10. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  11. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  12. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
38 more
  1. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  2. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  3. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  4. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  5. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  6. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  7. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  8. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  9. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
  10. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  11. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  12. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  13. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  14. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  15. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  16. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  17. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  18. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  19. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  20. 2021Revisiting Point Cloud Shape Classification with a Simple and Effective Baselinecited by 145
  21. 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 137
  22. 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
  23. 2021Adversarial purification with Score-based generative modelscited by 132
  24. 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
  25. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  26. 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 109
  27. 2020Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embeddingcited by 97
  28. 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Featurescited by 97
  29. 2020Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Trainingcited by 93
  30. 2020Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?cited by 79
  31. 2021Revisiting and Advancing Fast Adversarial Training Through The Lens of Bi-Level Optimizationcited by 75
  32. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
  33. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
  34. 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
  35. 2021Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minimacited by 57
  36. 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
  37. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Defense by k-Winners-Take-Allcited by 51
  38. 2021Adversarial Attacks are Reversible with Natural Supervisioncited by 47

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.