mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Domain-Independent Agent Architecture for Adaptive Operation in Evolving Open Worlds

arXiv 2306.06272 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model-based reasoning agents are ill-equipped to act in novel situations in which their model of the environment no longer sufficiently represents the world. We propose HYDRA - a framework for designing model-based agents operating in mixed discrete-continuous worlds, that can autonomously detect when the environment has evolved from its canonical setup, understand how it has evolved, and adapt the agents' models to perform effectively. HYDRA is based upon PDDL+, a rich modeling language for planning in mixed, discrete-continuous environments. It augments the planning module with visual reasoning, task selection, and action execution modules for closed-loop interaction with complex environments. HYDRA implements a novel meta-reasoning process that enables the agent to monitor its own behavior from a variety of aspects. The process employs a diverse set of computational methods to maintain expectations about the agent's own behavior in an environment. Divergences from those expectations are useful in detecting when the environment has evolved and identifying opportunities to adapt the underlying models. HYDRA builds upon ideas from diagnosis and repair and uses a heuristics-guided search over model changes such that they become competent in novel conditions. The HYDRA framework has been used to implement novelty-aware agents for three diverse domains - CartPole++ (a higher dimension variant of a classic control problem), Science Birds (an IJCAI competition problem), and PogoStick (a specific problem domain in Minecraft). We report empirical observations from these domains to demonstrate the efficacy of various components in the novelty meta-reasoning process.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

10 of 71 references.

References · 10

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2018Selective Experience Replay for Lifelong Learningcited by 239
  3. 2022The Familiarity Hypothesis: Explaining the Behavior of Deep Open Set Methodscited by 28
  4. 2022AI Autonomy : Self-Initiated Open-World Continual Learning and Adaptationcited by 23
  5. 2017Efficient, Safe, and Probably Approximately Complete Learning of Action Modelscited by 16
  6. 2021Safe Learning of Lifted Action Modelscited by 16
  7. 2020On Exploiting Hitting Sets for Model Reconciliationcited by 11
  8. 2014COLIN: Planning with Continuous Linear Numeric Changecited by 10
  9. 2022Differential Assessment of Black-Box AI Agentscited by 6
  10. 2023Heuristic Search For Physics-Based Problems: Angry Birds in PDDL+cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Successful Strategies Fail: Adaptation to Environmental Novelty in Terminal Agents
  2. 2025CoEx -- Co-evolving World-model and Exploration
  3. 2026ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step
  4. 2026ProPlay: Procedural World Models for Self-Evolving LLM Agents
  5. 2026CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery
  6. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems
  7. 2026Foundation World Models for Agents that Learn, Verify, and Adapt Reliably Beyond Static Environments
  8. 2026C-World: A Computer Use Agent Environment Creator