mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differential Assessment of Black-Box AI Agents

arXiv 2203.13236 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2022cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Much of the research on learning symbolic models of AI agents focuses on agents with stationary models. This assumption fails to hold in settings where the agent's capabilities may change as a result of learning, adaptation, or other post-deployment modifications. Efficient assessment of agents in such settings is critical for learning the true capabilities of an AI system and for ensuring its safe usage. In this work, we propose a novel approach to "differentially" assess black-box AI agents that have drifted from their previously known models. As a starting point, we consider the fully observable and deterministic setting. We leverage sparse observations of the drifted agent's current behavior and knowledge of its initial model to generate an active querying policy that selectively queries the agent and computes an updated model of its functionality. Empirical evaluation shows that our approach is much more efficient than re-learning the agent model from scratch. We also show that the cost of differential assessment using our method is proportional to the amount of drift in the agent's functionality.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

Builds on

2 of 29 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017Efficient, Safe, and Probably Approximately Complete Learning of Action Modelscited by 16
  2. 2019Model-Free Model Reconciliationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.