HiTZ@Antidote: Argumentation-driven Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Digital Medicine
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Providing high quality explanations for AI predictions based on machine learning is a challenging and complex task. To work well it requires, among other factors: selecting a proper level of generality/specificity of the explanation; considering assumptions about the familiarity of the explanation beneficiary with the AI task under consideration; referring to specific elements that have contributed to the decision; making use of additional knowledge (e.g. expert evidence) which might not be part of the prediction process; and providing evidence supporting negative hypothesis. Finally, the system needs to formulate the explanation in a clearly interpretable, and possibly convincing, way. Given these considerations, ANTIDOTE fosters an integrated vision of explainable AI, where low-level characteristics of the deep learning process are combined with higher level schemes proper of the human argumentation capacity. ANTIDOTE will exploit cross-disciplinary competences in deep learning and argumentation to support a broader and innovative view of explainable AI, where the need for high-quality explanations for clinical cases deliberation is critical. As a first result of the project, we publish the Antidote CasiMedicos dataset to facilitate research on explainable AI in general, and argumentation in the medical domain in particular.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.
Builds on
15 of 29 references.
References · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 99
- 2020From Arguments to Key Points: Towards Automatic Argument Summarizationcited by 60
- 2019Argument Generation with Retrieval, Planning, and Realizationcited by 45
- 2017Neural End-to-End Learning for Computational Argumentation Miningcited by 41
- 2018Neural Argument Generation Augmented with Externally Retrieved Evidencecited by 34
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024MedExpQA: Multilingual Benchmarking of Large Language Models for Medical Question Answeringcited by 43
- 2024CasiMedicos-Arg: A Medical Question Answering Dataset Annotated with Explanatory Argumentative Structurescited by 11
- 2025Explainable AI for Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Survey of Clinician Perceptions and Preferencescited by 4
- 2026Effects of Cross-lingual Evidence in Multilingual Medical Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2026MIRA-Ev:A Benchmark for Granular Evidence Detection and Relational Reasoning in Clinical Examscited by 0
- 2026MIRA-Ev:A Benchmark for Granular Evidence Detection and Relational Reasoning in Clinical Exams21 Jul 2026
- 2026Effects of Cross-lingual Evidence in Multilingual Medical Question Answering22 Apr 2026
- 2025Explainable AI for Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Survey of Clinician Perceptions and Preferences27 Feb 2025
- 2024CasiMedicos-Arg: A Medical Question Answering Dataset Annotated with Explanatory Argumentative Structures7 Oct 2024
- 2024MedExpQA: Multilingual Benchmarking of Large Language Models for Medical Question Answering8 Apr 2024