Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Minimising upper bounds on the population risk or the generalisation gap has been widely used in structural risk minimisation (SRM) -- this is in particular at the core of PAC-Bayesian learning. Despite its successes and unfailing surge of interest in recent years, a limitation of the PAC-Bayesian framework is that most bounds involve a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence term (or its variations), which might exhibit erratic behavior and fail to capture the underlying geometric structure of the learning problem -- hence restricting its use in practical applications. As a remedy, recent studies have attempted to replace the KL divergence in the PAC-Bayesian bounds with the Wasserstein distance. Even though these bounds alleviated the aforementioned issues to a certain extent, they either hold in expectation, are for bounded losses, or are nontrivial to minimize in an SRM framework. In this work, we contribute to this line of research and prove novel Wasserstein distance-based PAC-Bayesian generalisation bounds for both batch learning with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, and online learning with potentially non-i.i.d. data. Contrary to previous art, our bounds are stronger in the sense that (i) they hold with high probability, (ii) they apply to unbounded (potentially heavy-tailed) losses, and (iii) they lead to optimizable training objectives that can be used in SRM. As a result we derive novel Wasserstein-based PAC-Bayesian learning algorithms and we illustrate their empirical advantage on a variety of experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.
Builds on
45 of 77 references.
References · 45
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2019A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learningcited by 130
- 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
- 2020Tighter risk certificates for neural networkscited by 112
- 2015How much does your data exploration overfit? Controlling bias via information usagecited by 95
- 2020PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-Guaranteescited by 85
- 2017Meta-Learning by Adjusting Priors Based on Extended PAC-Bayes Theorycited by 76
33 more
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
- 2016Simpler PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Hostile Datacited by 45
- 2020PAC-Bayes unleashed: generalisation bounds with unbounded lossescited by 43
- 2021Tighter expected generalization error bounds via Wasserstein distancecited by 43
- 2019Dichotomize and Generalize: PAC-Bayesian Binary Activated Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
- 2019PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequalitycited by 36
- 2019Constrained Deep Networks: Lagrangian Optimization via Log-Barrier Extensionscited by 30
- 2020Differentiable PAC-Bayes Objectives with Partially Aggregated Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2021Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning via PAC-Bayes and Uniform Stabilitycited by 29
- 2022Generalization Bounds via Convex Analysiscited by 27
- 2023A unified recipe for deriving (time-uniform) PAC-Bayes boundscited by 25
- 2021Fractal Structure and Generalization Properties of Stochastic Optimization Algorithmscited by 23
- 2022PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Heavy-Tailed Losses through Supermartingalescited by 23
- 2022Non-Vacuous Generalisation Bounds for Shallow Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2022Online PAC-Bayes Learningcited by 22
- 2021Bridging the Gap Between Practice and PAC-Bayes Theory in Few-Shot Meta-Learningcited by 21
- 2019PAC-Bayesian Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 20
- 2022On PAC-Bayesian reconstruction guarantees for VAEscited by 20
- 2021On Margins and Derandomisation in PAC-Bayescited by 19
- 2022Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Boundscited by 19
- 2022PAC-Bayesian Offline Contextual Bandits With Guaranteescited by 19
- 2021Learning Stochastic Majority Votes by Minimizing a PAC-Bayes Generalization Boundcited by 16
- 2020PAC-Bayesian Bound for the Conditional Value at Riskcited by 13
- 2021No-Regret Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 13
- 2023Tighter PAC-Bayes Bounds Through Coin-Bettingcited by 13
- 2021Progress in Self-Certified Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2022Change of measure through the Legendre transformcited by 10
- 2022Tighter PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds by Leveraging Example Difficultycited by 9
- 2023Bayes meets Bernstein at the Meta Level: an Analysis of Fast Rates in Meta-Learning with PAC-Bayescited by 8
- 2022On Margins and Generalisation for Voting Classifierscited by 7
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Analysis for a two-step Hierarchical Multiview Learning Approachcited by 4
- 2018An Optimal Transport View on Generalizationcited by 4
- 2022PAC-Bayesian Lifelong Learning For Multi-Armed Banditscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validitycited by 17
- 2024A PAC-Bayesian Link Between Generalisation and Flat Minimacited by 13
- 2024The Method of Gaps: Exact Expressions for the Generalization Error of Supervised Learning Algorithmscited by 5
- 2025How good is PAC-Bayes at explaining generalisation?cited by 4
- 2024Tighter Generalisation Bounds via Interpolationcited by 2
- 2023A note on regularised NTK dynamics with an application to PAC-Bayesian trainingcited by 1
- 2024Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayescited by 1
- 2025Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds: Can Rescaling Invariances Help?cited by 1
- 2025PAC-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Trains Generalizable Policiescited by 1
- 2025Stability-based Generalization Bounds for Variational Inferencecited by 0
- 2026A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learning25 May 2026
- 2025PAC-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Trains Generalizable Policies12 Oct 2025
- 2025Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds: Can Rescaling Invariances Help?30 Sep 2025
- 2025How good is PAC-Bayes at explaining generalisation?11 Mar 2025
- 2025Stability-based Generalization Bounds for Variational Inference17 Feb 2025
- 2024The Method of Gaps: Exact Expressions for the Generalization Error of Supervised Learning Algorithms18 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes14 Oct 2024
- 2024A PAC-Bayesian Link Between Generalisation and Flat Minima13 Feb 2024
- 2024Tighter Generalisation Bounds via Interpolation7 Feb 2024
- 2023A note on regularised NTK dynamics with an application to PAC-Bayesian training20 Dec 2023
- 2023More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validity21 Jun 2023