mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Bounds

arXiv 2306.04375 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Minimising upper bounds on the population risk or the generalisation gap has been widely used in structural risk minimisation (SRM) -- this is in particular at the core of PAC-Bayesian learning. Despite its successes and unfailing surge of interest in recent years, a limitation of the PAC-Bayesian framework is that most bounds involve a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence term (or its variations), which might exhibit erratic behavior and fail to capture the underlying geometric structure of the learning problem -- hence restricting its use in practical applications. As a remedy, recent studies have attempted to replace the KL divergence in the PAC-Bayesian bounds with the Wasserstein distance. Even though these bounds alleviated the aforementioned issues to a certain extent, they either hold in expectation, are for bounded losses, or are nontrivial to minimize in an SRM framework. In this work, we contribute to this line of research and prove novel Wasserstein distance-based PAC-Bayesian generalisation bounds for both batch learning with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, and online learning with potentially non-i.i.d. data. Contrary to previous art, our bounds are stronger in the sense that (i) they hold with high probability, (ii) they apply to unbounded (potentially heavy-tailed) losses, and (iii) they lead to optimizable training objectives that can be used in SRM. As a result we derive novel Wasserstein-based PAC-Bayesian learning algorithms and we illustrate their empirical advantage on a variety of experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.

Builds on

45 of 77 references.

References · 45

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
  4. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
  5. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  6. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
  7. 2019A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learningcited by 130
  8. 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
  9. 2020Tighter risk certificates for neural networkscited by 112
  10. 2015How much does your data exploration overfit? Controlling bias via information usagecited by 95
  11. 2020PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-Guaranteescited by 85
  12. 2017Meta-Learning by Adjusting Priors Based on Extended PAC-Bayes Theorycited by 76
33 more
  1. 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
  2. 2016Simpler PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Hostile Datacited by 45
  3. 2020PAC-Bayes unleashed: generalisation bounds with unbounded lossescited by 43
  4. 2021Tighter expected generalization error bounds via Wasserstein distancecited by 43
  5. 2019Dichotomize and Generalize: PAC-Bayesian Binary Activated Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  6. 2019PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequalitycited by 36
  7. 2019Constrained Deep Networks: Lagrangian Optimization via Log-Barrier Extensionscited by 30
  8. 2020Differentiable PAC-Bayes Objectives with Partially Aggregated Neural Networkscited by 29
  9. 2021Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning via PAC-Bayes and Uniform Stabilitycited by 29
  10. 2022Generalization Bounds via Convex Analysiscited by 27
  11. 2023A unified recipe for deriving (time-uniform) PAC-Bayes boundscited by 25
  12. 2021Fractal Structure and Generalization Properties of Stochastic Optimization Algorithmscited by 23
  13. 2022PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Heavy-Tailed Losses through Supermartingalescited by 23
  14. 2022Non-Vacuous Generalisation Bounds for Shallow Neural Networkscited by 22
  15. 2022Online PAC-Bayes Learningcited by 22
  16. 2021Bridging the Gap Between Practice and PAC-Bayes Theory in Few-Shot Meta-Learningcited by 21
  17. 2019PAC-Bayesian Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 20
  18. 2022On PAC-Bayesian reconstruction guarantees for VAEscited by 20
  19. 2021On Margins and Derandomisation in PAC-Bayescited by 19
  20. 2022Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Boundscited by 19
  21. 2022PAC-Bayesian Offline Contextual Bandits With Guaranteescited by 19
  22. 2021Learning Stochastic Majority Votes by Minimizing a PAC-Bayes Generalization Boundcited by 16
  23. 2020PAC-Bayesian Bound for the Conditional Value at Riskcited by 13
  24. 2021No-Regret Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 13
  25. 2023Tighter PAC-Bayes Bounds Through Coin-Bettingcited by 13
  26. 2021Progress in Self-Certified Neural Networkscited by 10
  27. 2022Change of measure through the Legendre transformcited by 10
  28. 2022Tighter PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds by Leveraging Example Difficultycited by 9
  29. 2023Bayes meets Bernstein at the Meta Level: an Analysis of Fast Rates in Meta-Learning with PAC-Bayescited by 8
  30. 2022On Margins and Generalisation for Voting Classifierscited by 7
  31. 2016PAC-Bayesian Analysis for a two-step Hierarchical Multiview Learning Approachcited by 4
  32. 2018An Optimal Transport View on Generalizationcited by 4
  33. 2022PAC-Bayesian Lifelong Learning For Multi-Armed Banditscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

11 papers.