mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward AI Matching Policies in Homeless Services: A Qualitative Study with Policymakers

arXiv 2508.07129 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence researchers have proposed various data-driven algorithms to improve the processes that match individuals experiencing homelessness to scarce housing resources. It remains unclear whether and how these algorithms are received or adopted by practitioners and what their corresponding consequences are. Through semi-structured interviews with 13 policymakers in homeless services in Los Angeles, we investigate whether such change-makers are open to the idea of integrating AI into the housing resource matching process, identifying where they see potential gains and drawbacks from such a system in issues of efficiency, fairness, and transparency. Our qualitative analysis indicates that, even when aware of various complicating factors, policymakers welcome the idea of an AI matching tool if thoughtfully designed and used in tandem with human decision-makers. Though there is no consensus as to the exact design of such an AI system, insights from policymakers raise open questions and design considerations that can be enlightening for future researchers and practitioners who aim to build responsible algorithmic systems to support decision-making in low-resource scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

11 of 59 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Servicescited by 29
  2. 2021A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfarecited by 23
  3. 2022Imagining new futures beyond predictive systems in child welfare: A qualitative study with impacted stakeholderscited by 15
  4. 2023Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decision-Makingcited by 12
  5. 2023Deploying a Robust Active Preference Elicitation Algorithm on MTurk: Experiment Design, Interface, and Evaluation for COVID-19 Patient Prioritizationcited by 8
  6. 2023Learning Optimal and Fair Policies for Online Allocation of Scarce Societal Resources from Data Collected in Deploymentcited by 7
  7. 2024A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Homelessness Researchcited by 7
  8. 2025The Datafication of Care in Public Homelessness Servicescited by 6
  9. 2022Learning Resource Allocation Policies from Observational Data with an Application to Homeless Services Deliverycited by 5
  10. 2022Fairness in Contextual Resource Allocation Systems: Metrics and Incompatibility Resultscited by 2
  11. 2023Learning Optimal Classification Trees Robust to Distribution Shiftscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.