mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes Using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2306.00324 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.MAcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness plays a crucial role in various multi-agent systems (e.g., communication networks, financial markets, etc.). Many multi-agent dynamical interactions can be cast as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). While existing research has focused on studying fairness in known environments, the exploration of fairness in such systems for unknown environments remains open. In this paper, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach to achieve fairness in multi-agent finite-horizon episodic MDPs. Instead of maximizing the sum of individual agents' value functions, we introduce a fairness function that ensures equitable rewards across agents. Since the classical Bellman's equation does not hold when the sum of individual value functions is not maximized, we cannot use traditional approaches. Instead, in order to explore, we maintain a confidence bound of the unknown environment and then propose an online convex optimization based approach to obtain a policy constrained to this confidence region. We show that such an approach achieves sub-linear regret in terms of the number of episodes. Additionally, we provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantee based on the obtained regret bound. We also propose an offline RL algorithm and bound the optimality gap with respect to the optimal fair solution. To mitigate computational complexity, we introduce a policy-gradient type method for the fair objective. Simulation experiments also demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

29 of 55 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  2. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  3. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  4. 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 258
  5. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  6. 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 175
  7. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  8. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
  9. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
  10. 2019Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policiescited by 117
  11. 2021V-Learning -- A Simple, Efficient, Decentralized Algorithm for Multiagent RLcited by 111
  12. 2018Dynamic Weights in Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
17 more
  1. 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  2. 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
  3. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
  4. 2018Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Based Resource Allocation for UAV Networkscited by 54
  5. 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 53
  6. 2019Learning Fairness in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 44
  7. 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
  8. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  9. 2019Tight Regret Bounds for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Greedy Policiescited by 38
  10. 2022Proportional Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 20
  11. 2022Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 17
  12. 2020My Fair Bandit: Distributed Learning of Max-Min Fairness with Multi-player Banditscited by 16
  13. 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
  14. 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  15. 2019Group Fairness in Bandit Arm Selectioncited by 12
  16. 2020Achieving User-Side Fairness in Contextual Banditscited by 10
  17. 2022Reinforcement Learning with Stepwise Fairness Constraintscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Fairness in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
  2. 2022Provably Efficient Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Strategy-wise Bonus
  3. 2023Offline Learning in Markov Games with General Function Approximation
  4. 2022Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Multi-batch Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Agent-Specific Preference
  7. 2026Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning