mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Diffeomorphic Mesh Deformation via Efficient Optimal Transport for Cortical Surface Reconstruction

arXiv 2305.17555 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mesh deformation plays a pivotal role in many 3D vision tasks including dynamic simulations, rendering, and reconstruction. However, defining an efficient discrepancy between predicted and target meshes remains an open problem. A prevalent approach in current deep learning is the set-based approach which measures the discrepancy between two surfaces by comparing two randomly sampled point-clouds from the two meshes with Chamfer pseudo-distance. Nevertheless, the set-based approach still has limitations such as lacking a theoretical guarantee for choosing the number of points in sampled point-clouds, and the pseudo-metricity and the quadratic complexity of the Chamfer divergence. To address these issues, we propose a novel metric for learning mesh deformation. The metric is defined by sliced Wasserstein distance on meshes represented as probability measures that generalize the set-based approach. By leveraging probability measure space, we gain flexibility in encoding meshes using diverse forms of probability measures, such as continuous, empirical, and discrete measures via varifold representation. After having encoded probability measures, we can compare meshes by using the sliced Wasserstein distance which is an effective optimal transport distance with linear computational complexity and can provide a fast statistical rate for approximating the surface of meshes. To the end, we employ a neural ordinary differential equation (ODE) to deform the input surface into the target shape by modeling the trajectories of the points on the surface. Our experiments on cortical surface reconstruction demonstrate that our approach surpasses other competing methods in multiple datasets and metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

43 of 80 references.

References · 43

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  2. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  3. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2020Accelerating 3D Deep Learning with PyTorch3Dcited by 784
  7. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 700
  8. 2018VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registrationcited by 662
  9. 2018Pixel2Mesh: Generating 3D Mesh Models from Single RGB Imagescited by 651
  10. 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 588
  11. 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
  12. 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 373
31 more
  1. 2019DISN: Deep Implicit Surface Network for High-quality Single-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 333
  2. 2017Octree Generating Networks: Efficient Convolutional Architectures for High-resolution 3D Outputscited by 189
  3. 2019Unsupervised Learning of Probabilistic Diffeomorphic Registration for Images and Surfacescited by 186
  4. 2018PPF-FoldNet: Unsupervised Learning of Rotation Invariant 3D Local Descriptorscited by 141
  5. 2018Unsupervised Learning for Fast Probabilistic Diffeomorphic Registrationcited by 116
  6. 2019Deep Mesh Reconstruction from Single RGB Images via Topology Modification Networkscited by 106
  7. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 96
  8. 2017Hierarchical Surface Prediction for 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 89
  9. 2019Statistical bounds for entropic optimal transport: sample complexity and the central limit theoremcited by 85
  10. 2020Distributional Sliced-Wasserstein and Applications to Generative Modelingcited by 69
  11. 2018Learning a Probabilistic Model for Diffeomorphic Registrationcited by 62
  12. 2020Neural Mesh Flow: 3D Manifold Mesh Generation via Diffeomorphic Flowscited by 61
  13. 20193DN: 3D Deformation Networkcited by 60
  14. 2019Sinkhorn Divergences for Unbalanced Optimal Transportcited by 55
  15. 2019Voxel2Mesh: 3D Mesh Model Generation from Volumetric Datacited by 53
  16. 2021Point-set Distances for Learning Representations of 3D Point Cloudscited by 48
  17. 2023Energy-Based Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 39
  18. 2022Topology-Preserving Shape Reconstruction and Registration via Neural Diffeomorphic Flowcited by 38
  19. 2019GEOMetrics: Exploiting Geometric Structure for Graph-Encoded Objectscited by 27
  20. 2020DeepCSR: A 3D Deep Learning Approach for Cortical Surface Reconstructioncited by 27
  21. 2022Vox2Cortex: Fast Explicit Reconstruction of Cortical Surfaces from 3D MRI Scans with Geometric Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
  22. 2013The varifold representation of non-oriented shapes for diffeomorphic registrationcited by 24
  23. 2022CortexODE: Learning Cortical Surface Reconstruction by Neural ODEscited by 22
  24. 20193D Point Cloud Denoising via Deep Neural Network based Local Surface Estimationcited by 20
  25. 2022Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Neural Velocity Fieldcited by 20
  26. 2023Sliced Wasserstein Estimation with Control Variatescited by 16
  27. 2021PialNN: A Fast Deep Learning Framework for Cortical Pial Surface Reconstructioncited by 13
  28. 2022CorticalFlow++: Boosting Cortical Surface Reconstruction Accuracy, Regularity, and Interoperabilitycited by 12
  29. 2023Self-Attention Amortized Distributional Projection Optimization for Sliced Wasserstein Point-Cloud Reconstructioncited by 7
  30. 2022CorticalFlow: A Diffeomorphic Mesh Deformation Module for Cortical Surface Reconstructioncited by 5
  31. 2018Diffeomorphic registration of discrete geometric distributionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.