Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tasks that model the relation between pairs of tokens in a string are a vital part of understanding natural language. Such tasks, in general, require exhaustive pair-wise comparisons of tokens, thus having a quadratic runtime complexity in the length of the string. We show that these exhaustive comparisons can be avoided, and, moreover, the complexity of such tasks can be reduced to linear by casting the relation between tokens as a partial order over the string. Our method predicts real numbers for each token in a string in parallel and sorts the tokens accordingly, resulting in total orders of the tokens in the string. Each total order implies a set of arcs oriented from smaller to greater tokens, sorted by their predicted numbers. The intersection of total orders results in a partial order over the set of tokens in the string, which is then decoded into a directed graph representing the desired linguistic structure. Our experiments on dependency parsing and coreference resolution show that our method achieves state-of-the-art or comparable performance. Moreover, the linear complexity and parallelism of our method double the speed of graph-based coreference resolution models, and bring a 10-times speed-up over graph-based dependency parsers.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
25 of 86 references.
References · 25
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 834
- 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 700
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2017End-to-end Neural Coreference Resolutioncited by 241
- 2015Order-Embeddings of Images and Languagecited by 113
- 2017Neural Language Modeling by Jointly Learning Syntax and Lexiconcited by 57
- 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
- 2020Revealing the Myth of Higher-Order Inference in Coreference Resolutioncited by 49
- 2020Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 48
13 more
- 2021Coreference Resolution without Span Representationscited by 45
- 2019Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebankcited by 43
- 2019Viable Dependency Parsing as Sequence Labelingcited by 34
- 2018Straight to the Tree: Constituency Parsing with Neural Syntactic Distancecited by 32
- 2018Constituent Parsing as Sequence Labelingcited by 26
- 2018Scheduled Multi-Task Learning: From Syntax to Translationcited by 18
- 2019Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inferencecited by 17
- 2020Second-Order Neural Dependency Parsing with Message Passing and End-to-End Trainingcited by 17
- 2020Bracketing Encodings for 2-Planar Dependency Parsingcited by 15
- 2020A Unifying Theory of Transition-based and Sequence Labeling Parsingcited by 12
- 2021Headed-Span-Based Projective Dependency Parsingcited by 11
- 2019A Critical Analysis of Biased Parsers in Unsupervised Parsingcited by 7
- 2022A Structured Span Selectorcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.