Theoretical Understandings of Product Embedding for E-commerce Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Product embeddings have been heavily investigated in the past few years, serving as the cornerstone for a broad range of machine learning applications in e-commerce. Despite the empirical success of product embeddings, little is known on how and why they work from the theoretical standpoint. Analogous results from the natural language processing (NLP) often rely on domain-specific properties that are not transferable to the e-commerce setting, and the downstream tasks often focus on different aspects of the embeddings. We take an e-commerce-oriented view of the product embeddings and reveal a complete theoretical view from both the representation learning and the learning theory perspective. We prove that product embeddings trained by the widely-adopted skip-gram negative sampling algorithm and its variants are sufficient dimension reduction regarding a critical product relatedness measure. The generalization performance in the downstream machine learning task is controlled by the alignment between the embeddings and the product relatedness measure. Following the theoretical discoveries, we conduct exploratory experiments that supports our theoretical insights for the product embeddings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2021.
Builds on
16 of 32 references.
References · 16
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
- 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
- 2020Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Searchcited by 155
- 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
- 2014word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding methodcited by 109
- 2018Billion-scale Commodity Embedding for E-commerce Recommendation in Alibabacited by 105
- 2016Item2Vec: Neural Item Embedding for Collaborative Filteringcited by 72
- 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
- 2019Product Knowledge Graph Embedding for E-commercecited by 36
4 more
- 2016Meta-Prod2Vec - Product Embeddings Using Side-Information for Recommendationcited by 30
- 2016E-commerce in Your Inbox: Product Recommendations at Scalecited by 28
- 2019Knowledge-aware Complementary Product Representation Learningcited by 10
- 2018What the Vec? Towards Probabilistically Grounded Embeddingscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3.
4 papers.
- 2021Rethinking Neural vs. Matrix-Factorization Collaborative Filtering: the Theoretical Perspectivescited by 8
- 2023It's Enough: Relaxing Diagonal Constraints in Linear Autoencoders for Recommendationcited by 7
- 2023GRAFENNE: Learning on Graphs with Heterogeneous and Dynamic Feature Setscited by 7
- 2023Pretrained Embeddings for E-commerce Machine Learning: When it Fails and Why?cited by 1
- 2023GRAFENNE: Learning on Graphs with Heterogeneous and Dynamic Feature Sets6 Jun 2023
- 2023It's Enough: Relaxing Diagonal Constraints in Linear Autoencoders for Recommendation22 May 2023
- 2023Pretrained Embeddings for E-commerce Machine Learning: When it Fails and Why?9 Apr 2023
- 2021Rethinking Neural vs. Matrix-Factorization Collaborative Filtering: the Theoretical Perspectives23 Oct 2021