mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Effective Visual Representations for Partial-Label Learning

arXiv 2305.06080 ↗First posted 10 May 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Under partial-label learning (PLL) where, for each training instance, only a set of ambiguous candidate labels containing the unknown true label is accessible, contrastive learning has recently boosted the performance of PLL on vision tasks, attributed to representations learned by contrasting the same/different classes of entities. Without access to true labels, positive points are predicted using pseudo-labels that are inherently noisy, and negative points often require large batches or momentum encoders, resulting in unreliable similarity information and a high computational overhead. In this paper, we rethink a state-of-the-art contrastive PLL method PiCO[24], inspiring the design of a simple framework termed PaPi (Partial-label learning with a guided Prototypical classifier), which demonstrates significant scope for improvement in representation learning, thus contributing to label disambiguation. PaPi guides the optimization of a prototypical classifier by a linear classifier with which they share the same feature encoder, thus explicitly encouraging the representation to reflect visual similarity between categories. It is also technically appealing, as PaPi requires only a few components in PiCO with the opposite direction of guidance, and directly eliminates the contrastive learning module that would introduce noise and consume computational resources. We empirically demonstrate that PaPi significantly outperforms other PLL methods on various image classification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 45 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  6. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  7. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  8. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
  9. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  10. 2020Attribute Prototype Network for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 160
  11. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  12. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
11 more
  1. 2020MoPro: Webly Supervised Learning with Momentum Prototypescited by 66
  2. 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
  3. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  4. 2020Multimodal Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 48
  5. 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
  6. 2019GM-PLL: Graph Matching based Partial Label Learningcited by 23
  7. 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
  8. 2020Unsupervised Semantic Aggregation and Deformable Template Matching for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 14
  9. 2020Network Cooperation with Progressive Disambiguation for Partial Label Learningcited by 13
  10. 2021Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learningcited by 10
  11. 2021Learning with Proper Partial Labelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.