mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Single Positive Multi-label Classification with Generalized Robust Loss

arXiv 2405.03501 ↗First posted 6 May 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-label learning (MLL) requires comprehensive multi-semantic annotations that is hard to fully obtain, thus often resulting in missing labels scenarios. In this paper, we investigate Single Positive Multi-label Learning (SPML), where each image is associated with merely one positive label. Existing SPML methods only focus on designing losses using mechanisms such as hard pseudo-labeling and robust losses, mostly leading to unacceptable false negatives. To address this issue, we first propose a generalized loss framework based on expected risk minimization to provide soft pseudo labels, and point out that the former losses can be seamlessly converted into our framework. In particular, we design a novel robust loss based on our framework, which enjoys flexible coordination between false positives and false negatives, and can additionally deal with the imbalance between positive and negative samples. Extensive experiments show that our approach can significantly improve SPML performance and outperform the vast majority of state-of-the-art methods on all the four benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.

Builds on

26 of 48 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  5. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  7. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
  8. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  9. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  10. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  11. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  12. 2019Learning a Deep ConvNet for Multi-label Classification with Partial Labelscited by 124
14 more
  1. 2022DualCoOp: Fast Adaptation to Multi-Label Recognition with Limited Annotationscited by 102
  2. 2020The Emerging Trends of Multi-Label Learningcited by 99
  3. 2021Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labelscited by 81
  4. 2021SimPLE: Similar Pseudo Label Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 68
  5. 2022Large Loss Matters in Weakly Supervised Multi-Label Classificationcited by 38
  6. 2021ACPL: Anti-curriculum Pseudo-labelling for Semi-supervised Medical Image Classificationcited by 34
  7. 2021Simple and Robust Loss Design for Multi-Label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 30
  8. 2022Acknowledging the Unknown for Multi-label Learning with Single Positive Labelscited by 24
  9. 2022One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancementcited by 22
  10. 2022Spatial Consistency Loss for Training Multi-Label Classifiers from Single-Label Annotationscited by 17
  11. 2023Learning in Imperfect Environment: Multi-Label Classification with Long-Tailed Distribution and Partial Labelscited by 17
  12. 2023Towards Effective Visual Representations for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  13. 2022Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative Attackscited by 4
  14. 2023Can Class-Priors Help Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.