Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We motivate weakly supervised learning as an effective learning paradigm for problems where curating perfectly annotated datasets is expensive and may require domain expertise such as fine-grained classification. We focus on Partial Label Learning (PLL), a weakly-supervised learning paradigm where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), one of which is the true label. Noisy PLL (NPLL) relaxes this constraint by allowing some partial labels to not contain the true label, enhancing the practicality of the problem. Our work centres on NPLL and presents a framework that initially assigns pseudo-labels to images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbour algorithm. These pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of pseudo-labels. We perform thorough experiments on seven datasets and compare against nine NPLL and PLL methods. We achieve state-of-the-art results in all studied settings from the prior literature, obtaining substantial gains in the simulated fine-grained benchmarks. Further, we show the promising generalisation capability of our framework in realistic, fine-grained, crowd-sourced datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,457
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,170
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,490
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,082
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,627
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 415
- 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
12 more
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
- 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
- 2023S-CLIP: Semi-supervised Vision-Language Learning using Few Specialist Captionscited by 29
- 2022PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learningcited by 21
- 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
- 2023Towards Effective Visual Representations for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
- 2023ALIM: Adjusting Label Importance Mechanism for Noisy Partial Label Learningcited by 9
- 2022IRNet: Iterative Refinement Network for Noisy Partial Label Learningcited by 3
- 2023Unreliable Partial Label Learning with Recursive Separationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026PaSta: Noisy Node Classification with Partial Label Learning26 Aug 2026