Toward Evaluating Robustness of Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Policy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning agents are susceptible to evasion attacks during deployment. In single-agent environments, these attacks can occur through imperceptible perturbations injected into the inputs of the victim policy network. In multi-agent environments, an attacker can manipulate an adversarial opponent to influence the victim policy's observations indirectly. While adversarial policies offer a promising technique to craft such attacks, current methods are either sample-inefficient due to poor exploration strategies or require extra surrogate model training under the black-box assumption. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose Intrinsically Motivated Adversarial Policy (IMAP) for efficient black-box adversarial policy learning in both single- and multi-agent environments. We formulate four types of adversarial intrinsic regularizers -- maximizing the adversarial state coverage, policy coverage, risk, or divergence -- to discover potential vulnerabilities of the victim policy in a principled way. We also present a novel bias-reduction method to balance the extrinsic objective and the adversarial intrinsic regularizers adaptively. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of the four types of adversarial intrinsic regularizers and the bias-reduction method in enhancing black-box adversarial policy learning across a variety of environments. Our IMAP successfully evades two types of defense methods, adversarial training and robust regularizer, decreasing the performance of the state-of-the-art robust WocaR-PPO agents by 34%-54% across four single-agent tasks. IMAP also achieves a state-of-the-art attacking success rate of 83.91% in the multi-agent game YouShallNotPass. Our code is available at urlhttps://github.com/x-zheng16/IMAP.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.
Builds on
44 of 61 references.
References · 44
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2018Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Researchcited by 256
- 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
32 more
- 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 240
- 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 187
- 2021Behavior From the Void: Unsupervised Active Pre-Trainingcited by 173
- 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 163
- 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 133
- 2017Emergent Complexity via Multi-Agent Competitioncited by 117
- 2020Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 101
- 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 91
- 2019Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systemscited by 90
- 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Losscited by 73
- 2018Diversity-Driven Exploration Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning using Adversarial Populationscited by 64
- 2020Stealthy and Efficient Adversarial Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
- 2021Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLcited by 54
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2021Adversarially Guided Actor-Criticcited by 47
- 2022Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
- 2021CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional Smoothingcited by 41
- 2021MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored Regionscited by 40
- 2021Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
- 2017Whatever Does Not Kill Deep Reinforcement Learning, Makes It Strongercited by 35
- 2020Robustifying Reinforcement Learning Agents via Action Space Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policies with Visual Foresightcited by 17
- 2023Attacking Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning by Adversarial Minority Influencecited by 16
- 2022Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Bootstrapped Opportunistic Curriculumcited by 15
- 2021Neural Network Verification in Controlcited by 14
- 2021Targeted Attack on Deep RL-based Autonomous Driving with Learned Visual Patternscited by 13
- 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policiescited by 10
- 2021Robust Value Iteration for Continuous Control Taskscited by 8
- 2018Gradient Band-based Adversarial Training for Generalized Attack Immunity of A3C Path Findingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.