Robust Value Iteration for Continuous Control Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When transferring a control policy from simulation to a physical system, the policy needs to be robust to variations in the dynamics to perform well. Commonly, the optimal policy overfits to the approximate model and the corresponding state-distribution, often resulting in failure to trasnfer underlying distributional shifts. In this paper, we present Robust Fitted Value Iteration, which uses dynamic programming to compute the optimal value function on the compact state domain and incorporates adversarial perturbations of the system dynamics. The adversarial perturbations encourage a optimal policy that is robust to changes in the dynamics. Utilizing the continuous-time perspective of reinforcement learning, we derive the optimal perturbations for the states, actions, observations and model parameters in closed-form. Notably, the resulting algorithm does not require discretization of states or actions. Therefore, the optimal adversarial perturbations can be efficiently incorporated in the min-max value function update. We apply the resulting algorithm to the physical Furuta pendulum and cartpole. By changing the masses of the systems we evaluate the quantitative and qualitative performance across different model parameters. We show that robust value iteration is more robust compared to deep reinforcement learning algorithm and the non-robust version of the algorithm. Videos of the experiments are shown at https://sites.google.com/view/rfvi
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2021.
Builds on
31 of 64 references.
References · 31
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 687
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
- 2018Closing the Sim-to-Real Loop: Adapting Simulation Randomization with Real World Experiencecited by 217
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 214
- 2017Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability: A Brief Overview and Recent Advancescited by 201
- 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 174
19 more
- 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 170
- 2018Model-Based Value Estimation for Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
- 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 154
- 2020Neural Lyapunov Controlcited by 142
- 2020Conservative Safety Critics for Explorationcited by 113
- 2020Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Modelscited by 111
- 2018The Lyapunov Neural Network: Adaptive Stability Certification for Safe Learning of Dynamical Systemscited by 88
- 2019BayesSim: adaptive domain randomization via probabilistic inference for robotics simulatorscited by 85
- 2020Dynamics Randomization Revisited:A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotioncited by 59
- 2020MushroomRL: Simplifying Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 50
- 2020Data-efficient Domain Randomization with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 47
- 2020Hamilton-Jacobi Deep Q-Learning for Deterministic Continuous-Time Systems with Lipschitz Continuous Controlscited by 31
- 2020Safe Optimal Control Using Stochastic Barrier Functions and Deep Forward-Backward SDEscited by 22
- 2021Value Iteration in Continuous Actions, States and Timecited by 18
- 2013Scaling Up Robust MDPs by Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2016Supervision via Competition: Robot Adversaries for Learning Taskscited by 16
- 2019Learning Deep Stochastic Optimal Control Policies using Forward-Backward SDEscited by 13
- 2017ADAPT: Zero-Shot Adaptive Policy Transfer for Stochastic Dynamical Systemscited by 9
- 2019HJB Optimal Feedback Control with Deep Differential Value Functions and Action Constraintscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Reviewcited by 63
- 2021Vision-Guided Quadrupedal Locomotion in the Wild with Multi-Modal Delay Randomizationcited by 23
- 2021Continuous-Time Fitted Value Iteration for Robust Policiescited by 6
- 2023Toward Evaluating Robustness of Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Policycited by 3
- 2021Adversarially Robust Stability Certificates can be Sample-Efficientcited by 2
- 2023Twice Regularized Markov Decision Processes: The Equivalence between Robustness and Regularizationcited by 1
- 2025Is Bellman Equation Enough for Learning Control?cited by 0
- 2026Entropy Regularization Improves Policy Robustness in Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Entropy Regularization Improves Policy Robustness in Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning3 Jul 2026
- 2025Is Bellman Equation Enough for Learning Control?4 Mar 2025
- 2023Toward Evaluating Robustness of Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Policy4 May 2023
- 2023Twice Regularized Markov Decision Processes: The Equivalence between Robustness and Regularization12 Mar 2023
- 2021Adversarially Robust Stability Certificates can be Sample-Efficient20 Dec 2021
- 2021Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Review1 Nov 2021
- 2021Continuous-Time Fitted Value Iteration for Robust Policies5 Oct 2021
- 2021Vision-Guided Quadrupedal Locomotion in the Wild with Multi-Modal Delay Randomization29 Sep 2021