mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustifying Reinforcement Learning Agents via Action Space Adversarial Training

arXiv 2007.07176 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adoption of machine learning (ML)-enabled cyber-physical systems (CPS) are becoming prevalent in various sectors of modern society such as transportation, industrial, and power grids. Recent studies in deep reinforcement learning (DRL) have demonstrated its benefits in a large variety of data-driven decisions and control applications. As reliance on ML-enabled systems grows, it is imperative to study the performance of these systems under malicious state and actuator attacks. Traditional control systems employ resilient/fault-tolerant controllers that counter these attacks by correcting the system via error observations. However, in some applications, a resilient controller may not be sufficient to avoid a catastrophic failure. Ideally, a robust approach is more useful in these scenarios where a system is inherently robust (by design) to adversarial attacks. While robust control has a long history of development, robust ML is an emerging research area that has already demonstrated its relevance and urgency. However, the majority of robust ML research has focused on perception tasks and not on decision and control tasks, although the ML (specifically RL) models used for control applications are equally vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we show that a well-performing DRL agent that is initially susceptible to action space perturbations (e.g. actuator attacks) can be robustified against similar perturbations through adversarial training.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 133
  2. 2021Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLcited by 54
  3. 2023The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 50
  4. 2022Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
  5. 2023Seeing is not Believing: Robust Reinforcement Learning against Spurious Correlationcited by 25
  6. 2022A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 12
  7. 2025Robust Gymnasium: A Unified Modular Benchmark for Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  8. 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policiescited by 10
  9. 2023Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Beyond Probabilitiescited by 8
  10. 2024Beyond Worst-case Attacks: Robust RL with Adaptive Defense via Non-dominated Policiescited by 8
  11. 2025Wolfpack Adversarial Attack for Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  12. 2021Balancing detectability and performance of attacks on the control channel of Markov Decision Processescited by 4
18 more
  1. 2022Feasible Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning for Underspecified Environmentscited by 4
  2. 2023Regret-Based Defense in Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  3. 2023Toward Evaluating Robustness of Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Policycited by 3
  4. 2022Review of Metrics to Measure the Stability, Robustness and Resilience of Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  5. 2024On Minimizing Adversarial Counterfactual Error in Adversarial RLcited by 2
  6. 2022Red Teaming with Mind Reading: White-Box Adversarial Policies Against RL Agentscited by 1
  7. 2022Security of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 1
  8. 2024Provably Efficient Action-Manipulation Attack Against Continuous Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  9. 2026Interaction-Breaking Adversarial Learning Framework for Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  10. 2026The Sim-to-Real Gap of Foundation Model Agents: A Unified MDP Perspectivecited by 1
  11. 2022Bounded Robustness in Reinforcement Learning via Lexicographic Objectivescited by 0
  12. 2023ReMAV: Reward Modeling of Autonomous Vehicles for Finding Likely Failure Eventscited by 0
  13. 2024Lipschitz-Regularized Critics Lead to Policy Robustness Against Transition Dynamics Uncertaintycited by 0
  14. 2025Towards a constructive framework for control theorycited by 0
  15. 2025Off-Policy Actor-Critic for Adversarial Observation Robustness: Virtual Alternative Training via Symmetric Policy Evaluationcited by 0
  16. 2025Policy Disruption in Reinforcement Learning:Adversarial Attack with Large Language Models and Critical State Identificationcited by 0
  17. 2026Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Modelscited by 0
  18. 2026ASGARD: Action-Space Guard for UAV Resilience via Reinforcement Learningcited by 0