On the Impact of Data Quality on Image Classification Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the proliferation of algorithmic decision-making, increased scrutiny has been placed on these systems. This paper explores the relationship between the quality of the training data and the overall fairness of the models trained with such data in the context of supervised classification. We measure key fairness metrics across a range of algorithms over multiple image classification datasets that have a varying level of noise in both the labels and the training data itself. We describe noise in the labels as inaccuracies in the labelling of the data in the training set and noise in the data as distortions in the data, also in the training set. By adding noise to the original datasets, we can explore the relationship between the quality of the training data and the fairness of the output of the models trained on that data.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2023.
Builds on
14 of 33 references.
References · 14
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Data Quality Dimensions and Tools for Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2024Enhancing Data Quality through Simple De-duplication: Navigating Responsible Computational Social Science Researchcited by 1
- 2025When Data Quality Issues Collide: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Co-Occurring Data Quality Issues in Software Defect Predictioncited by 1
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Surveycited by 0
- 2025Chunked Data Shapley: A Scalable Dataset Quality Assessment for Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2025When Data Quality Issues Collide: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Co-Occurring Data Quality Issues in Software Defect Prediction19 Dec 2025
- 2025Chunked Data Shapley: A Scalable Dataset Quality Assessment for Machine Learning22 Aug 2025
- 2024Enhancing Data Quality through Simple De-duplication: Navigating Responsible Computational Social Science Research4 Oct 2024
- 2024A Survey on Data Quality Dimensions and Tools for Machine Learning28 Jun 2024
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Survey1 Jun 2024