mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Impact of Data Quality on Image Classification Fairness

arXiv 2305.01595 ↗First posted 2 May 2023cs.CV cs.CY cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the proliferation of algorithmic decision-making, increased scrutiny has been placed on these systems. This paper explores the relationship between the quality of the training data and the overall fairness of the models trained with such data in the context of supervised classification. We measure key fairness metrics across a range of algorithms over multiple image classification datasets that have a varying level of noise in both the labels and the training data itself. We describe noise in the labels as inaccuracies in the labelling of the data in the training set and noise in the data as distortions in the data, also in the training set. By adding noise to the original datasets, we can explore the relationship between the quality of the training data and the fairness of the output of the models trained on that data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2023.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  5. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  6. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  8. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  9. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  10. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  11. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
  12. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
2 more
  1. 2019Coverage Testing of Deep Learning Models using Dataset Characterizationcited by 4
  2. 2022Fairness-Aware Naive Bayes Classifier for Data with Multiple Sensitive Featurescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

5 papers.