Fairness-Aware Naive Bayes Classifier for Data with Multiple Sensitive Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness-aware machine learning seeks to maximise utility in generating predictions while avoiding unfair discrimination based on sensitive attributes such as race, sex, religion, etc. An important line of work in this field is enforcing fairness during the training step of a classifier. A simple yet effective binary classification algorithm that follows this strategy is two-naive-Bayes (2NB), which enforces statistical parity - requiring that the groups comprising the dataset receive positive labels with the same likelihood. In this paper, we generalise this algorithm into N-naive-Bayes (NNB) to eliminate the simplification of assuming only two sensitive groups in the data and instead apply it to an arbitrary number of groups. We propose an extension of the original algorithm's statistical parity constraint and the post-processing routine that enforces statistical independence of the label and the single sensitive attribute. Then, we investigate its application on data with multiple sensitive features and propose a new constraint and post-processing routine to enforce differential fairness, an extension of established group-fairness constraints focused on intersectionalities. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the NNB algorithm on US Census datasets and compare its accuracy and debiasing performance, as measured by disparate impact and DF-ε score, with similar group-fairness algorithms. Finally, we lay out important considerations users should be aware of before incorporating this algorithm into their application, and direct them to further reading on the pros, cons, and ethical implications of using statistical parity as a fairness criterion.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.
Builds on
20 of 36 references.
References · 20
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2018A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunitycited by 53
- 2018Downstream Effects of Affirmative Actioncited by 34
8 more
- 2020On the Moral Justification of Statistical Paritycited by 30
- 2019Auditing and Achieving Intersectional Fairness in Classification Problemscited by 25
- 2019General Fair Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 23
- 2021Group Fairness: Independence Revisitedcited by 20
- 2020Beyond Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 13
- 2020Causal Multi-Level Fairnesscited by 13
- 2018On preserving non-discrimination when combining expert advicecited by 12
- 2017On conditional parity as a notion of non-discrimination in machine learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.