mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Data Quality through Simple De-duplication: Navigating Responsible Computational Social Science Research

arXiv 2410.03545 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research in natural language processing (NLP) for Computational Social Science (CSS) heavily relies on data from social media platforms. This data plays a crucial role in the development of models for analysing socio-linguistic phenomena within online communities. In this work, we conduct an in-depth examination of 20 datasets extensively used in NLP for CSS to comprehensively examine data quality. Our analysis reveals that social media datasets exhibit varying levels of data duplication. Consequently, this gives rise to challenges like label inconsistencies and data leakage, compromising the reliability of models. Our findings also suggest that data duplication has an impact on the current claims of state-of-the-art performance, potentially leading to an overestimation of model effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Finally, we propose new protocols and best practices for improving dataset development from social media data and its usage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

Builds on

26 of 78 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  3. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  4. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  5. 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
  6. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
  7. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
  8. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  9. 2019SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 209
  10. 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 164
  11. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
  12. 2017Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Surveycited by 103
14 more
  1. 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 100
  2. 2018RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumourscited by 74
  3. 2015Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threadscited by 62
  4. 2021Just What do You Think You're Doing, Dave?' A Checklist for Responsible Data Use in NLPcited by 47
  5. 2018Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systemscited by 26
  6. 2019Automatically Identifying Complaints in Social Mediacited by 25
  7. 2019What Twitter Profile and Posted Images Reveal About Depression and Anxietycited by 17
  8. 2023It's about Time: Rethinking Evaluation on Rumor Detection Benchmarks using Chronological Splitscited by 15
  9. 2023VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy towards COVID-19 Vaccination on Twittercited by 14
  10. 2020Analyzing Political Parody in Social Mediacited by 13
  11. 2022Automatic Identification and Classification of Bragging in Social Mediacited by 12
  12. 2017A Longitudinal Assessment of the Persistence of Twitter Datasetscited by 11
  13. 2017Automatic Image Filtering on Social Networks Using Deep Learning and Perceptual Hashing During Crisescited by 8
  14. 2023On the Impact of Data Quality on Image Classification Fairnesscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.