HQP: A Human-Annotated Dataset for Detecting Online Propaganda
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online propaganda poses a severe threat to the integrity of societies. However, existing datasets for detecting online propaganda have a key limitation: they were annotated using weak labels that can be noisy and even incorrect. To address this limitation, our work makes the following contributions: (1) We present HQP: a novel dataset (N = 30,000) for detecting online propaganda with high-quality labels. To the best of our knowledge, HQP is the first large-scale dataset for detecting online propaganda that was created through human annotation. (2) We show empirically that state-of-the-art language models fail in detecting online propaganda when trained with weak labels (AUC: 64.03). In contrast, state-of-the-art language models can accurately detect online propaganda when trained with our high-quality labels (AUC: 92.25), which is an improvement of ~44%. (3) We show that prompt-based learning using a small sample of high-quality labels can still achieve a reasonable performance (AUC: 80.27) while significantly reducing the cost of labeling. (4) We extend HQP to HQP+ to test how well propaganda across different contexts can be detected. Crucially, our work highlights the importance of high-quality labels for sensitive NLP tasks such as propaganda detection.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
15 more
- 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
- 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 152
- 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
- 2020GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Mediacited by 108
- 2019Fine-grained Fact Verification with Kernel Graph Attention Networkcited by 105
- 2021Towards Propagation Uncertainty: Edge-enhanced Bayesian Graph Convolutional Networks for Rumor Detectioncited by 34
- 2021Towards Fine-Grained Reasoning for Fake News Detectioncited by 32
- 2022Zero-Shot Rumor Detection with Propagation Structure via Prompt Learningcited by 32
- 2022Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukrainecited by 15
- 2022Detecting False Rumors from Retweet Dynamics on Social Mediacited by 10
- 2023Automated multilingual detection of Pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers and Telegram postscited by 6
- 2020Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contentscited by 5
- 2023Retrieving false claims on Twitter during the Russia-Ukraine conflictcited by 5
- 2022This joke is [MASK]: Recognizing Humor and Offense with Promptingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 173
- 2023Generative AIcited by 119
- 2023Analyzing the Strategy of Propaganda using Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Evidence from the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukrainecited by 2
- 2025Fine-grained Narrative Classification in Biased News Articlescited by 0
- 2025Fine-grained Narrative Classification in Biased News Articles3 Dec 2025
- 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?25 Sep 2023
- 2023Generative AI13 Sep 2023
- 2023Analyzing the Strategy of Propaganda using Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Evidence from the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine24 Jul 2023