Detecting False Rumors from Retweet Dynamics on Social Media
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
False rumors are known to have detrimental effects on society. To prevent the spread of false rumors, social media platforms such as Twitter must detect them early. In this work, we develop a novel probabilistic mixture model that classifies true vs. false rumors based on the underlying spreading process. Specifically, our model is the first to formalize the self-exciting nature of true vs. false retweeting processes. This results in a novel mixture marked Hawkes model (MMHM). Owing to this, our model obviates the need for feature engineering; instead, it directly models the spreading process in order to make inferences of whether online rumors are incorrect. Our evaluation is based on 13,650 retweet cascades of both true. vs. false rumors from Twitter. Our model recognizes false rumors with a balanced accuracy of 64.97% and an AUC of 69.46%. It outperforms state-of-the-art baselines (both neural and feature engineering) by a considerable margin but while being fully interpretable. Our work has direct implications for practitioners: it leverages the spreading process as an implicit quality signal and, based on it, detects false content.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Memory-Guided Multi-View Multi-Domain Fake News Detectioncited by 31
- 2022Improving Fake News Detection of Influential Domain via Domain- and Instance-Level Transfercited by 19
- 2022Characterizing Multi-Domain False News and Underlying User Effects on Chinese Weibocited by 8
- 2023HQP: A Human-Annotated Dataset for Detecting Online Propagandacited by 4
- 2023Fake News Detection Through Graph-based Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 3
- 2023Linguistic-style-aware Neural Networks for Fake News Detectioncited by 2
- 2024Semantic Evolvement Enhanced Graph Autoencoder for Rumor Detectioncited by 1
- 2022Region-enhanced Deep Graph Convolutional Networks for Rumor Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Verifying Rumors via Stance-Aware Structural Modelingcited by 0
- 2026A Survey on Quantitative Modeling of Trust in Online Social Networkscited by 0
- 2026A Survey on Quantitative Modeling of Trust in Online Social Networks26 Feb 2026
- 2025Verifying Rumors via Stance-Aware Structural Modeling15 Dec 2025
- 2024Semantic Evolvement Enhanced Graph Autoencoder for Rumor Detection24 Apr 2024
- 2023Fake News Detection Through Graph-based Neural Networks: A Survey24 Jul 2023
- 2023HQP: A Human-Annotated Dataset for Detecting Online Propaganda28 Apr 2023
- 2023Linguistic-style-aware Neural Networks for Fake News Detection7 Jan 2023
- 2022Improving Fake News Detection of Influential Domain via Domain- and Instance-Level Transfer19 Sep 2022
- 2022Memory-Guided Multi-View Multi-Domain Fake News Detection26 Jun 2022
- 2022Region-enhanced Deep Graph Convolutional Networks for Rumor Detection15 Jun 2022
- 2022Characterizing Multi-Domain False News and Underlying User Effects on Chinese Weibo6 May 2022