mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visual Referential Games Further the Emergence of Disentangled Representations

arXiv 2304.14511 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural languages are powerful tools wielded by human beings to communicate information. Among their desirable properties, compositionality has been the main focus in the context of referential games and variants, as it promises to enable greater systematicity to the agents which would wield it. The concept of disentanglement has been shown to be of paramount importance to learned representations that generalise well in deep learning, and is thought to be a necessary condition to enable systematicity. Thus, this paper investigates how do compositionality at the level of the emerging languages, disentanglement at the level of the learned representations, and systematicity relate to each other in the context of visual referential games. Firstly, we find that visual referential games that are based on the Obverter architecture outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised learning approach in terms of many major disentanglement metrics. Secondly, we expand the previously proposed Positional Disentanglement (PosDis) metric for compositionality to (re-)incorporate some concerns pertaining to informativeness and completeness features found in the Mutual Information Gap (MIG) disentanglement metric it stems from. This extension allows for further discrimination between the different kind of compositional languages that emerge in the context of Obverter-based referential games, in a way that neither the referential game accuracy nor previous metrics were able to capture. Finally we investigate whether the resulting (emergent) systematicity, as measured by zero-shot compositional learning tests, correlates with any of the disentanglement and compositionality metrics proposed so far. Throughout the training process, statically significant correlation coefficients can be found both positive and negative depending on the moment of the measure.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2023.

Builds on

40 of 82 references.

References · 40

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  4. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  5. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
  6. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  7. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
  8. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
  9. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
  10. 2018Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoderscited by 167
  11. 2017DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  12. 2019Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 138
28 more
  1. 2017Emergence of Language with Multi-agent Games: Learning to Communicate with Sequences of Symbolscited by 123
  2. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
  3. 2020Compositionality and Generalization in Emergent Languagescited by 103
  4. 2018Emergence of Linguistic Communication from Referential Games with Symbolic and Pixel Inputcited by 102
  5. 2018Learning Deep Disentangled Embeddings with the F-Statistic Losscited by 101
  6. 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
  7. 2019Are Disentangled Representations Helpful for Abstract Visual Reasoning?cited by 100
  8. 2019Compositional generalization through meta sequence-to-sequence learningcited by 98
  9. 2017Natural Language Does Not Emerge 'Naturally' in Multi-Agent Dialogcited by 86
  10. 2020Compositional Languages Emerge in a Neural Iterated Learning Modelcited by 75
  11. 2019Ease-of-Teaching and Language Structure from Emergent Communicationcited by 65
  12. 2019Anti-efficient encoding in emergent communicationcited by 59
  13. 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
  14. 2019Compositional generalization in a deep seq2seq model by separating syntax and semanticscited by 56
  15. 2020A Sober Look at the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations and their Evaluationcited by 52
  16. 2018Rearranging the Familiar: Testing Compositional Generalization in Recurrent Networkscited by 51
  17. 2019Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agentcited by 50
  18. 2019SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Pythoncited by 49
  19. 2018Memorize or generalize? Searching for a compositional RNN in a haystackcited by 41
  20. 2018Compositional Obverter Communication Learning From Raw Visual Inputcited by 30
  21. 2019The Emergence of Compositional Languages for Numeric Concepts Through Iterated Learning in Neural Agentscited by 26
  22. 2018Emergence of Communication in an Interactive World with Consistent Speakerscited by 18
  23. 2019Word-order biases in deep-agent emergent communicationcited by 18
  24. 2019Transcoding compositionally: using attention to find more generalizable solutionscited by 14
  25. 2020On (Emergent) Systematic Generalisation and Compositionality in Visual Referential Games with Straight-Through Gumbel-Softmax Estimatorcited by 11
  26. 2020ReferentialGym: A Nomenclature and Framework for Language Emergence & Grounding in (Visual) Referential Gamescited by 10
  27. 2019Developmentally motivated emergence of compositional communication via template transfercited by 8
  28. 2017SCAN: Learning Hierarchical Compositional Visual Conceptscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.