mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multimodal Composite Association Score: Measuring Gender Bias in Generative Multimodal Models

arXiv 2304.13855 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.CYcited by 21

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative multimodal models based on diffusion models have seen tremendous growth and advances in recent years. Models such as DALL-E and Stable Diffusion have become increasingly popular and successful at creating images from texts, often combining abstract ideas. However, like other deep learning models, they also reflect social biases they inherit from their training data, which is often crawled from the internet. Manually auditing models for biases can be very time and resource consuming and is further complicated by the unbounded and unconstrained nature of inputs these models can take. Research into bias measurement and quantification has generally focused on small single-stage models working on a single modality. Thus the emergence of multistage multimodal models requires a different approach. In this paper, we propose Multimodal Composite Association Score (MCAS) as a new method of measuring gender bias in multimodal generative models. Evaluating both DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion using this approach uncovered the presence of gendered associations of concepts embedded within the models. We propose MCAS as an accessible and scalable method of quantifying potential bias for models with different modalities and a range of potential biases.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2023.

Builds on

12 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr

Other references · 11

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  4. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  5. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  6. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  7. 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
  8. 2015Seeing through the Human Reporting Bias: Visual Classifiers from Noisy Human-Centric Labelscited by 64
  9. 2020InsideBias: Measuring Bias in Deep Networks and Application to Face Gender Biometricscited by 31
  10. 2021UDIS: Unsupervised Discovery of Bias in Deep Visual Recognition Modelscited by 23
  11. 2022A study on the distribution of social biases in self-supervised learning visual modelscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 8; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicinecited by 231
  2. 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 154
  3. 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 66
  4. 2023'Person' == Light-skinned, Western Man, and Sexualization of Women of Color: Stereotypes in Stable Diffusioncited by 33
  5. 2023Stable Diffusion Exposed: Gender Bias from Prompt to Imagecited by 25
  6. 2024Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in Future Models?cited by 24
  7. 2024BiasDora: Exploring Hidden Biased Associations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 12
  8. 2023Analysing Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Models using Object Detectioncited by 7
  9. 2024Resampled Datasets Are Not Enough: Mitigating Societal Bias Beyond Single Attributescited by 7
  10. 2025Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptionscited by 6
  11. 2025Bias in Gender Bias Benchmarks: How Spurious Features Distort Evaluationcited by 5
  12. 2023Biased Attention: Do Vision Transformers Amplify Gender Bias More than Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 4
9 more
  1. 2023AudRandAug: Random Image Augmentations for Audio Classificationcited by 3
  2. 2025From Individuals to Interactions: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Multimodal Large Language Models from the Lens of Social Relationshipcited by 2
  3. 2024More is Less? A Simulation-Based Approach to Dynamic Interactions between Biases in Multimodal Modelscited by 1
  4. 2025Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanationscited by 1
  5. 2026Gender Artifacts from Art History to Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1
  6. 2024FaceSaliencyAug: Mitigating Geographic, Gender and Stereotypical Biases via Saliency-Based Data Augmentationcited by 0
  7. 2024Saliency-Based diversity and fairness Metric and FaceKeepOriginalAugment: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Fairness and Diversitycited by 0
  8. 2026Investigating Disability Representations in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 0
  9. 2026Newer Is Not Fairer: Gender Stereotyping in Text-to-Image AI Across Model Generationscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Generated Bias: Auditing Internal Bias Dynamics of Text-To-Image Generative Models
  2. 2025Automated Evaluation of Gender Bias Across 13 Large Multimodal Models
  3. 2023MultiModal Bias: Introducing a Framework for Stereotypical Bias Assessment beyond Gender and Race in Vision Language Models
  4. 2025Do Existing Testing Tools Really Uncover Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Models?
  5. 2023Exploring Social Bias in Downstream Applications of Text-to-Image Foundation Models
  6. 2021Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models
  7. 2025Model-Agnostic Gender Bias Control for Text-to-Image Generation via Sparse Autoencoder
  8. 2025Evaluating and comparing gender bias across four text-to-image models