mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Latent Fingerprint Recognition: Fusion of Local and Global Embeddings

arXiv 2304.13800 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the most challenging problems in fingerprint recognition continues to be establishing the identity of a suspect associated with partial and smudgy fingerprints left at a crime scene (i.e., latent prints or fingermarks). Despite the success of fixed-length embeddings for rolled and slap fingerprint recognition, the features learned for latent fingerprint matching have mostly been limited to local minutiae-based embeddings and have not directly leveraged global representations for matching. In this paper, we combine global embeddings with local embeddings for state-of-the-art latent to rolled matching accuracy with high throughput. The combination of both local and global representations leads to improved recognition accuracy across NIST SD 27, NIST SD 302, MSP, MOLF DB1/DB4, and MOLF DB2/DB4 latent fingerprint datasets for both closed-set (84.11%, 54.36%, 84.35%, 70.43%, 62.86% rank-1 retrieval rate, respectively) and open-set (0.50, 0.74, 0.44, 0.60, 0.68 FNIR at FPIR=0.02, respectively) identification scenarios on a gallery of 100K rolled fingerprints. Not only do we fuse the complimentary representations, we also use the local features to guide the global representations to focus on discriminatory regions in two fingerprint images to be compared. This leads to a multi-stage matching paradigm in which subsets of the retrieved candidate lists for each probe image are passed to subsequent stages for further processing, resulting in a considerable reduction in latency (requiring just 0.068 ms per latent to rolled comparison on a AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor, roughly 15K comparisons per second). Finally, we show the generalizability of the fused representations for improving authentication accuracy across several rolled, plain, and contactless fingerprint datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2023.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019Learning a Fixed-Length Fingerprint Representationcited by 49
  2. 2017FingerNet: An Unified Deep Network for Fingerprint Minutiae Extractioncited by 36
  3. 2022PrintsGAN: Synthetic Fingerprint Generatorcited by 30
  4. 2021C2CL: Contact to Contactless Fingerprint Matchingcited by 28
  5. 2022AFR-Net: Attention-Driven Fingerprint Recognition Networkcited by 23
  6. 2017Automated Latent Fingerprint Recognitioncited by 21
  7. 2022SpoofGAN: Synthetic Fingerprint Spoof Imagescited by 17
  8. 2022FingerGAN: A Constrained Fingerprint Generation Scheme for Latent Fingerprint Enhancementcited by 11
  9. 2022Synthetic Latent Fingerprint Generatorcited by 11
  10. 2018Matching Fingerphotos to Slap Fingerprint Imagescited by 8
  11. 2018ID Preserving Generative Adversarial Network for Partial Latent Fingerprint Reconstructioncited by 8
  12. 2016Latent fingerprint minutia extraction using fully convolutional networkcited by 6
4 more
  1. 2017Generative Convolutional Networks for Latent Fingerprint Reconstructioncited by 6
  2. 2020Latent Fingerprint Registration via Matching Densely Sampled Pointscited by 6
  3. 2018Latent Fingerprint Recognition: Role of Texture Templatecited by 5
  4. 2019White-Box Evaluation of Fingerprint Matchers: Robustness to Minutiae Perturbationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: