White-Box Evaluation of Fingerprint Matchers: Robustness to Minutiae Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prevailing evaluations of fingerprint recognition systems have been performed as end-to-end black-box tests of fingerprint identification or authentication accuracy. However, performance of the end-to-end system is subject to errors arising in any of its constituent modules, including: fingerprint scanning, preprocessing, feature extraction, and matching. Conversely, white-box evaluations provide a more granular evaluation by studying the individual sub-components of a system. While a few studies have conducted stand-alone evaluations of the fingerprint reader and feature extraction modules of fingerprint recognition systems, little work has been devoted towards white-box evaluations of the fingerprint matching module. We report results of a controlled, white-box evaluation of one open-source and two commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) minutiae-based matchers in terms of their robustness against controlled perturbations (random noise and non-linear distortions) introduced into the input minutiae feature sets. Our white-box evaluations reveal that the performance of fingerprint minutiae matchers are more susceptible to non-linear distortion and missing minutiae than spurious minutiae and small positional displacements of the minutiae locations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.
- 2023Latent Fingerprint Recognition: Fusion of Local and Global Embeddings26 Apr 2023
- 2023AdvBiom: Adversarial Attacks on Biometric Matchers10 Jan 2023