mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Latent Fingerprint Recognition

arXiv 1704.01925 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2017cs.CVcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Latent fingerprints are one of the most important and widely used evidence in law enforcement and forensic agencies worldwide. Yet, NIST evaluations show that the performance of state-of-the-art latent recognition systems is far from satisfactory. An automated latent fingerprint recognition system with high accuracy is essential to compare latents found at crime scenes to a large collection of reference prints to generate a candidate list of possible mates. In this paper, we propose an automated latent fingerprint recognition algorithm that utilizes Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) for ridge flow estimation and minutiae descriptor extraction, and extract complementary templates (two minutiae templates and one texture template) to represent the latent. The comparison scores between the latent and a reference print based on the three templates are fused to retrieve a short candidate list from the reference database. Experimental results show that the rank-1 identification accuracies (query latent is matched with its true mate in the reference database) are 64.7% for the NIST SD27 and 75.3% for the WVU latent databases, against a reference database of 100K rolled prints. These results are the best among published papers on latent recognition and competitive with the performance (66.7% and 70.8% rank-1 accuracies on NIST SD27 and WVU DB, respectively) of a leading COTS latent Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). By score-level (rank-level) fusion of our system with the commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) latent AFIS, the overall rank-1 identification performance can be improved from 64.7% and 75.3% to 73.3% (74.4%) and 76.6% (78.4%) on NIST SD27 and WVU latent databases, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Deep Gait Recognition: A Surveycited by 54
  2. 2022AFR-Net: Attention-Driven Fingerprint Recognition Networkcited by 23
  3. 2025BiggerGait: Unlocking Gait Recognition with Layer-wise Representations from Large Vision Modelscited by 18
  4. 2023Latent Fingerprint Recognition: Fusion of Local and Global Embeddingscited by 13
  5. 2021Federated Learning of User Verification Models Without Sharing Embeddingscited by 11
  6. 2023A Latent Fingerprint in the Wild Databasecited by 7
  7. 2023Fixed-length Dense Descriptor for Efficient Fingerprint Matchingcited by 7
  8. 2021Associated Spatio-Temporal Capsule Network for Gait Recognitioncited by 6
  9. 2024Latent Fingerprint Matching via Dense Minutia Descriptorcited by 5
  10. 2025Finger Pose Estimation for Under-screen Fingerprint Sensorcited by 5
  11. 2025Fixed-Length Dense Fingerprint Representation with Alignment and Robust Enhancementcited by 5
  12. 2023GaitGS: Temporal Feature Learning in Granularity and Span Dimension for Gait Recognitioncited by 3
9 more
  1. 2023Improving Hand Recognition in Uncontrolled and Uncooperative Environments using Multiple Spatial Transformers and Loss Functionscited by 1
  2. 2024Federated Learning with Only Positive Labels by Exploring Label Correlationscited by 1
  3. 2022Pair-Relationship Modeling for Latent Fingerprint Recognitioncited by 0
  4. 2024Fusion of Minutia Cylinder Codes and Minutia Patch Embeddings for Latent Fingerprint Recognitioncited by 0
  5. 2024FedHide: Federated Learning by Hiding in the Neighborscited by 0
  6. 2024Latent fingerprint enhancement for accurate minutiae detectioncited by 0
  7. 2025Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Dynamic Clustering and Contrastive Refinement for Gait Recognitioncited by 0
  8. 2025LatentPrintFormer: A Hybrid CNN-Transformer with Spatial Attention for Latent Fingerprint identificationcited by 0
  9. 2026AFID: A Unified Open Framework for Automated Fingermark Identification, Quality Assessment and Feature Extractioncited by 0