mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Test-Time Adaptation with Perturbation Consistency Learning

arXiv 2304.12764 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) do not cope well with the distribution shift problem, resulting in models trained on the training set failing in real test scenarios. To address this problem, the test-time adaptation (TTA) shows great potential, which updates model parameters to suit the test data at the testing time. Existing TTA methods rely on well-designed auxiliary tasks or self-training strategies based on pseudo-label. However, these methods do not achieve good trade-offs regarding performance gains and computational costs. To obtain some insights into such a dilemma, we take two representative TTA methods, i.e., Tent and OIL, for exploration and find that stable prediction is the key to achieving a good balance. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose perturbation consistency learning (PCL), a simple test-time adaptation method to promote the model to make stable predictions for samples with distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on adversarial robustness and cross-lingual transferring demonstrate that our method can achieve higher or comparable performance with less inference time over strong PLM backbones and previous state-of-the-art TTA methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.

Builds on

49 of 61 references.

References · 49

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  8. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  9. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  11. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
  12. 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 575
37 more
  1. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
  2. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  3. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  4. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  5. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
  6. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  7. 2019MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answeringcited by 339
  8. 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
  9. 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 293
  10. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
  11. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
  12. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  13. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  14. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  15. 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 186
  16. 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 164
  17. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
  18. 2020Neural Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in NLP---A Surveycited by 142
  19. 2021Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Surveycited by 107
  20. 2021Shifts: A Dataset of Real Distributional Shift Across Multiple Large-Scale Taskscited by 100
  21. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  22. 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
  23. 2020InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 92
  24. 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
  25. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  26. 2021Towards Efficient NLP: A Standard Evaluation and A Strong Baselinecited by 44
  27. 2021Consistency Regularization for Cross-Lingual Fine-Tuningcited by 41
  28. 2021HiddenCut: Simple Data Augmentation for Natural Language Understanding with Better Generalizationcited by 31
  29. 2022Enhancing Cross-lingual Transfer by Manifold Mixupcited by 30
  30. 2021RockNER: A Simple Method to Create Adversarial Examples for Evaluating the Robustness of Named Entity Recognition Modelscited by 28
  31. 2021Efficient Test Time Adapter Ensembling for Low-resource Language Varietiescited by 26
  32. 2021NoiseQA: Challenge Set Evaluation for User-Centric Question Answeringcited by 25
  33. 2020Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of a Pretrained Cross-Lingual Language Modelcited by 24
  34. 2021Self-Supervised Test-Time Learning for Reading Comprehensioncited by 22
  35. 2023Robust Question Answering against Distribution Shifts with Test-Time Adaptation: An Empirical Studycited by 8
  36. 2021Virtual Data Augmentation: A Robust and General Framework for Fine-tuning Pre-trained Modelscited by 5
  37. 2021Transfer Learning for Multi-lingual Tasks -- a Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.