Safe MDP Planning by Learning Temporal Patterns of Undesirable Trajectories and Averting Negative Side Effects
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In safe MDP planning, a cost function based on the current state and action is often used to specify safety aspects. In the real world, often the state representation used may lack sufficient fidelity to specify such safety constraints. Operating based on an incomplete model can often produce unintended negative side effects (NSEs). To address these challenges, first, we associate safety signals with state-action trajectories (rather than just an immediate state-action). This makes our safety model highly general. We also assume categorical safety labels are given for different trajectories, rather than a numerical cost function, which is harder to specify by the problem designer. We then employ a supervised learning model to learn such non-Markovian safety patterns. Second, we develop a Lagrange multiplier method, which incorporates the safety model and the underlying MDP model in a single computation graph to facilitate agent learning of safe behaviors. Finally, our empirical results on a variety of discrete and continuous domains show that this approach can satisfy complex non-Markovian safety constraints while optimizing an agent's total returns, is highly scalable, and is also better than the previous best approach for Markovian NSEs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2023.
Builds on
20 of 42 references.
References · 20
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2015Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradientscited by 156
- 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
8 more
- 2015Gradient Estimation Using Stochastic Computation Graphscited by 120
- 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
- 2018Penalizing side effects using stepwise relative reachabilitycited by 38
- 2019Conservative Agency via Attainable Utility Preservationcited by 35
- 2019Preferences Implicit in the State of the Worldcited by 33
- 2020Avoiding Side Effects By Considering Future Taskscited by 32
- 2015Safety-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for MDPscited by 31
- 2022Sample-efficient Iterative Lower Bound Optimization of Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Continuous MDPscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.