Towards Utilising a Range of Neural Activations for Comprehending Representational Associations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent efforts to understand intermediate representations in deep neural networks have commonly attempted to label individual neurons and combinations of neurons that make up linear directions in the latent space by examining extremal neuron activations and the highest direction projections. In this paper, we show that this approach, although yielding a good approximation for many purposes, fails to capture valuable information about the behaviour of a representation. Neural network activations are generally dense, and so a more complex, but realistic scenario is that linear directions encode information at various levels of stimulation. We hypothesise that non-extremal level activations contain complex information worth investigating, such as statistical associations, and thus may be used to locate confounding human interpretable concepts. We explore the value of studying a range of neuron activations by taking the case of mid-level output neuron activations and demonstrate on a synthetic dataset how they can inform us about aspects of representations in the penultimate layer not evident through analysing maximal activations alone. We use our findings to develop a method to curate data from mid-range logit samples for retraining to mitigate spurious correlations, or confounding concepts in the penultimate layer, on real benchmark datasets. The success of our method exemplifies the utility of inspecting non-maximal activations to extract complex relationships learned by models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2024.
Builds on
63 of 96 references.
References · 63
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
38 more
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
- 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2018A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networkscited by 182
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
- 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 128
- 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
- 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 120
- 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 114
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
- 2021An Interpretability Illusion for BERTcited by 94
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2019Weakly Supervised Disentanglement with Guaranteescited by 82
- 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
- 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 69
- 2022A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributescited by 56
- 2020Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionatelycited by 52
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Guaranteed Optimal Compositional Explanations for Neurons25 Nov 2025
- 2025Open Vocabulary Compositional Explanations for Neuron Alignment25 Nov 2025