mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable Ensembles of Hyper-Rectangles as Base Models

arXiv 2303.08625 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A new extremely simple ensemble-based model with the uniformly generated axis-parallel hyper-rectangles as base models (HRBM) is proposed. Two types of HRBMs are studied: closed rectangles and corners. The main idea behind HRBM is to consider and count training examples inside and outside each rectangle. It is proposed to incorporate HRBMs into the gradient boosting machine (GBM). Despite simplicity of HRBMs, it turns out that these simple base models allow us to construct effective ensemble-based models and avoid overfitting. A simple method for calculating optimal regularization parameters of the ensemble-based model, which can be modified in the explicit way at each iteration of GBM, is considered. Moreover, a new regularization called the "step height penalty" is studied in addition to the standard L1 and L2 regularizations. An extremely simple approach to the proposed ensemble-based model prediction interpretation by using the well-known method SHAP is proposed. It is shown that GBM with HRBM can be regarded as a model extending a set of interpretable models for explaining black-box models. Numerical experiments with real datasets illustrate the proposed GBM with HRBMs for regression and classification problems. Experiments also illustrate computational efficiency of the proposed SHAP modifications. The code of proposed algorithms implementing GBM with HRBM is publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2023.

Builds on

36 of 94 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  6. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  7. 2021On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorationscited by 281
  8. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
  9. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  10. 2020GraphLIME: Local Interpretable Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 209
  11. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  12. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
24 more
  1. 2020Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiatedcited by 127
  2. 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 125
  3. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  4. 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
  5. 2019A Comparative Analysis of XGBoostcited by 80
  6. 2020TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbationscited by 74
  7. 2020SurvLIME: A method for explaining machine learning survival modelscited by 34
  8. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 34
  9. 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
  10. 2019Enriching Visual with Verbal Explanations for Relational Concepts -- Combining LIME with Alephcited by 23
  11. 2021The Shapley Value of Classifiers in Ensemble Gamescited by 23
  12. 2021SHAFF: Fast and consistent SHApley eFfect estimates via random Forestscited by 22
  13. 2020Looking Deeper into Tabular LIMEcited by 20
  14. 2019Shapley Values of Reconstruction Errors of PCA for Explaining Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  15. 2014The Evolution of Boosting Algorithms - From Machine Learning to Statistical Modellingcited by 18
  16. 2020Interpretable Machine Learning with an Ensemble of Gradient Boosting Machinescited by 14
  17. 2021Accurate Shapley Values for explaining tree-based modelscited by 9
  18. 2021Ensembles of Random SHAPscited by 8
  19. 2019Gradient Boosting Machine: A Surveycited by 7
  20. 2020X-SHAP: towards multiplicative explainability of Machine Learningcited by 5
  21. 2020A Generalized Stacking for Implementing Ensembles of Gradient Boosting Machinescited by 3
  22. 2022Individualized and Global Feature Attributions for Gradient Boosted Trees in the Presence of ℓ2 Regularizationcited by 2
  23. 2023Unboxing Tree Ensembles for interpretability: a hierarchical visualization tool and a multivariate optimal re-built treecited by 2
  24. 2022SHAP for additively modeled features in a boosted trees modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.