Differentiable Interval Bottlenecks for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Numerical Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reconstruction-based anomaly detectors are accurate but opaque: a deep autoencoder flags a sample without telling a practitioner which feature ranges made it anomalous. We propose DIFFINT, an autoencoder whose latent bottleneck is structured as a set of soft, axis-aligned interval memberships learned end-to-end directly from raw numerical data, without any discretization or binarization. Each latent unit corresponds to a human-readable hyper-rectangle in feature space; an instance is encoded by how strongly it falls inside each interval relative to the other units, and its reconstruction error is the anomaly score. This keeps the power of differentiable representation learning while exposing an inspectable internal structure. We make the inductive bias precise: a certified reconstruction-error lower bound for points that fall outside every active coordinate of the learned support (with a Lipschitz-enforced decoder), and a graded, empirically verified suppression mechanism for the usual case in which only a few features are abnormal; and we provide a closed-form, label-free importance that ranks each (unit, feature) pair from quantities the model already maintains, turning trained intervals into auditable candidate constraints without ever seeing an anomaly label. On 48 ADBench benchmarks against 22 baselines under a common [-1, 1]-normalized protocol, DIFFINT attains the best mean rank overall on both metrics (4.10 on ROC-AUC, 4.16 on AUPR); among inlier-only detectors it leads its regime clearly, and it is competitive with the strongest contaminated-data detectors (see the stratified and complete-case analyses). It is the only interpretable detector in the statistically-tied leading cluster of seven methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 232
- 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 211
- 2020Adversarial Latent Autoencoderscited by 155
- 2020Deep Nearest Neighbor Anomaly Detectioncited by 104
- 2023On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detectioncited by 72
- 2021LUNAR: Unifying Local Outlier Detection Methods via Graph Neural Networkscited by 42
6 more
- 2021Scalable Rule-Based Representation Learning for Interpretable Classificationcited by 40
- 2023Fascinating Supervisory Signals and Where to Find Them: Deep Anomaly Detection with Scale Learningcited by 25
- 2025Scalable, Explainable and Provably Robust Anomaly Detection with One-Step Flow Matchingcited by 9
- 2023Finding Interpretable Class-Specific Patterns through Efficient Neural Searchcited by 5
- 2025Neurosymbolic Association Rule Mining from Tabular Datacited by 3
- 2023Interpretable Ensembles of Hyper-Rectangles as Base Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.