mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combinatorial Allocation Bandits with Nonlinear Arm Utility

arXiv 2603.07005 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A matching platform is a system that matches participants of different types, such as companies and job-seekers. In such a platform, maximizing matches may concentrate assignments on popular participants, increasing dissatisfaction among others, and eventually causing churn, which reduces the platform's profit opportunities. To address this issue, we propose a novel online learning problem, Combinatorial Allocation Bandits (CAB), which incorporates the notion of *arm satisfaction*. In CAB, at each round, the learner observes feature vectors for K arms and N users, assigns users to arms, and observes feedback following a generalized linear model (GLM). Unlike prior work, the objective is to maximize arm satisfaction rather than the number of positive feedback. For CAB, we develop an upper confidence bound algorithm that uses an approximate optimization oracle and achieves an approximate regret upper bound, whose dependence on d, T, and N matches the known lower bound for contextual combinatorial linear bandits up to logarithmic factors. We also analyze a Thompson sampling algorithm with a standard regret bound under an exact optimization oracle, and propose a cheaper one-pass variant retaining sublinear approximate regret under a self-concordance assumption. Experiments on synthetic data support the objective and show that CAB-UCB achieves higher cumulative satisfaction than baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 51 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
  2. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 164
  3. 2015Linear Contextual Bandits with Knapsackscited by 82
  4. 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
  5. 2019Randomized Exploration in Generalized Linear Banditscited by 70
  6. 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
  7. 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 64
  8. 2014Resourceful Contextual Banditscited by 45
  9. 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 43
  10. 2020Improved Confidence Bounds for the Linear Logistic Model and Applications to Linear Banditscited by 31
  11. 2020An Efficient Algorithm For Generalized Linear Bandit: Online Stochastic Gradient Descent and Thompson Samplingcited by 30
  12. 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Banditscited by 29
10 more
  1. 2017Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Knapsackscited by 23
  2. 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
  3. 2022Enabling Long-term Fairness in Dynamic Resource Allocationcited by 15
  4. 2022Double Doubly Robust Thompson Sampling for Generalized Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
  5. 2021Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Linear Payoff Functionscited by 9
  6. 2023No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocationcited by 9
  7. 2020Group-Fair Online Allocation in Continuous Timecited by 6
  8. 2020Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Sleeping Arms and Long-Term Fairness Constraintscited by 3
  9. 2024Combinatorial Logistic Banditscited by 3
  10. 2019An Arm-Wise Randomization Approach to Combinatorial Linear Semi-Banditscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.