mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Time Fairness in Online Knapsack Problems

arXiv 2305.13293 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LG cs.CY cs.DScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The online knapsack problem is a classic problem in the field of online algorithms. Its canonical version asks how to pack items of different values and weights arriving online into a capacity-limited knapsack so as to maximize the total value of the admitted items. Although optimal competitive algorithms are known for this problem, they may be fundamentally unfair, i.e., individual items may be treated inequitably in different ways. We formalize a practically-relevant notion of time fairness which effectively models a trade off between static and dynamic pricing in a motivating application such as cloud resource allocation, and show that existing algorithms perform poorly under this metric. We propose a parameterized deterministic algorithm where the parameter precisely captures the Pareto-optimal trade-off between fairness (static pricing) and competitiveness (dynamic pricing). We show that randomization is theoretically powerful enough to be simultaneously competitive and fair; however, it does not work well in experiments. To further improve the trade-off between fairness and competitiveness, we develop a nearly-optimal learning-augmented algorithm which is fair, consistent, and robust (competitive), showing substantial performance improvements in numerical experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

28 of 64 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  3. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  4. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
  5. 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
  6. 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 41
  7. 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 21
  8. 2021Fair Dynamic Rationingcited by 19
  9. 2021Pareto-Optimal Learning-Augmented Algorithms for Online Conversion Problemscited by 19
  10. 2020Online Nash Social Welfare Maximization with Predictionscited by 15
  11. 2020Competitive Algorithms for the Online Multiple Knapsack Problem with Application to Electric Vehicle Chargingcited by 15
  12. 2022Enabling Long-term Fairness in Dynamic Resource Allocationcited by 15
16 more
  1. 2020Data-driven Competitive Algorithms for Online Knapsack and Set Covercited by 14
  2. 2018Semi-Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 12
  3. 2022Single-Leg Revenue Management with Advicecited by 9
  4. 2023No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocationcited by 9
  5. 2017Optimal Posted Prices for Online Cloud Resource Allocationcited by 8
  6. 2017Fair Knapsackcited by 8
  7. 2021Fairness Maximization among Offline Agents in Online-Matching Marketscited by 6
  8. 2022Individual Fairness in Prophet Inequalitiescited by 5
  9. 2020Sequential Fair Allocation of Limited Resources under Stochastic Demandscited by 4
  10. 2018On Strong NP-Completeness of Rational Problemscited by 3
  11. 2018On Policies for Single-leg Revenue Management with Limited Demand Informationcited by 3
  12. 2020Group Fairness for Knapsack Problemscited by 3
  13. 2022The Online Knapsack Problem with Departurescited by 3
  14. 2023Addressing Bias in Online Selection with Limited Budget of Comparisonscited by 3
  15. 2017A new and improved algorithm for online bin packingcited by 2
  16. 2020Semi-online Scheduling: A Surveycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.