First-order ANIL provably learns representations despite overparametrization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to its empirical success in few-shot classification and reinforcement learning, meta-learning has recently received significant interest. Meta-learning methods leverage data from previous tasks to learn a new task in a sample-efficient manner. In particular, model-agnostic methods look for initialization points from which gradient descent quickly adapts to any new task. Although it has been empirically suggested that such methods perform well by learning shared representations during pretraining, there is limited theoretical evidence of such behavior. More importantly, it has not been shown that these methods still learn a shared structure, despite architectural misspecifications. In this direction, this work shows, in the limit of an infinite number of tasks, that first-order ANIL with a linear two-layer network architecture successfully learns linear shared representations. This result even holds with overparametrization; having a width larger than the dimension of the shared representations results in an asymptotically low-rank solution. The learned solution then yields a good adaptation performance on any new task after a single gradient step. Overall, this illustrates how well model-agnostic methods such as first-order ANIL can learn shared representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.
Builds on
24 of 32 references.
References · 24
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
- 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
- 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
- 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
- 2020On the Theory of Transfer Learning: The Importance of Task Diversitycited by 186
- 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
- 2020Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learningcited by 148
12 more
- 2019On the Convergence Theory of Gradient-Based Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 132
- 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 118
- 2021How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learningcited by 41
- 2021Generalization of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning Algorithms: Recurring and Unseen Taskscited by 36
- 2022Robust Fine-Tuning of Deep Neural Networks with Hessian-based Generalization Guaranteescited by 34
- 2022MAML and ANIL Provably Learn Representationscited by 30
- 2018Iterate averaging as regularization for stochastic gradient descentcited by 27
- 2023Over-Parameterization Exponentially Slows Down Gradient Descent for Learning a Single Neuroncited by 25
- 2023How to prepare your task head for finetuningcited by 18
- 2020A Sample Complexity Separation between Non-Convex and Convex Meta-Learningcited by 17
- 2021A Representation Learning Perspective on the Importance of Train-Validation Splitting in Meta-Learningcited by 12
- 2022Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce datacited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.