mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Context

arXiv 2302.14389 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2023cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A fundamental question in neurolinguistics concerns the brain regions involved in syntactic and semantic processing during speech comprehension, both at the lexical (word processing) and supra-lexical levels (sentence and discourse processing). To what extent are these regions separated or intertwined? To address this question, we trained a lexical language model, Glove, and a supra-lexical language model, GPT-2, on a text corpus from which we selectively removed either syntactic or semantic information. We then assessed to what extent these information-restricted models were able to predict the time-courses of fMRI signal of humans listening to naturalistic text. We also manipulated the size of contextual information provided to GPT-2 in order to determine the windows of integration of brain regions involved in supra-lexical processing. Our analyses show that, while most brain regions involved in language are sensitive to both syntactic and semantic variables, the relative magnitudes of these effects vary a lot across these regions. Furthermore, we found an asymmetry between the left and right hemispheres, with semantic and syntactic processing being more dissociated in the left hemisphere than in the right, and the left and right hemispheres showing respectively greater sensitivity to short and long contexts. The use of information-restricted NLP models thus shed new light on the spatial organization of syntactic processing, semantic processing and compositionality.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2023.

Builds on

10 of 102 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 196
  4. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
  5. 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
  6. 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 92
  7. 2019Compositional generalization in a deep seq2seq model by separating syntax and semanticscited by 56
  8. 2020Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humanscited by 42
  9. 2021Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in the Brain with Deep Networkscited by 39
  10. 2022Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helpscited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: