mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Metric Learning Encoding Models: A Multivariate Framework for Interpreting Neural Representations

arXiv 2402.11608 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how explicit theoretical features are encoded in opaque neural systems is a central challenge now common to neuroscience and AI. We introduce Metric Learning Encoding Models (MLEMs) to address this challenge most directly as a metric learning problem: we fit the distance in the space of theoretical features to match the distance in neural space. Our framework improves on univariate encoding and decoding methods by building on second-order isomorphism methods, such as Representational Similarity Analysis, and extends them by learning a metric that efficiently models feature as well as interactions between them. The effectiveness of MLEM is validated through two sets of simulations. First, MLEMs recover ground-truth importance features in synthetic datasets better than state-of-the-art methods, such as Feature Reweighted RSA (FR-RSA). Second, we deploy MLEMs on real language data, where they show stronger robustness to noise in calculating the importance of linguistic features (gender, tense, etc.). MLEMs are applicable to any domains where theoretical features can be identified, such as language, vision, audition, etc. We release optimized code applicable to measure feature importance in the representations of any artificial neural networks or empirical neural data at https://github.com/LouisJalouzot/MLEM.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2024.

Builds on

19 of 58 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  3. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  4. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  5. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
  6. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
  7. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 196
  8. 2014A Weighted Correlation Index for Rankings with Tiescited by 41
  9. 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
  10. 2022Joint processing of linguistic properties in brains and language modelscited by 37
  11. 2022Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helpscited by 26
  12. 2021Disentangling Semantics and Syntax in Sentence Embeddings with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 22
7 more
  1. 2018Interpreting Encoding and Decoding Modelscited by 21
  2. 2022Probing for Constituency Structure in Neural Language Modelscited by 13
  3. 2023Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Contextcited by 13
  4. 2021Long-range and hierarchical language predictions in brains and algorithmscited by 10
  5. 2023Variable Importance in High-Dimensional Settings Requires Groupingcited by 4
  6. 2023Parametrization Cookbook: A set of Bijective Parametrizations for using Machine Learning methods in Statistical Inferencecited by 3
  7. 2018Metric Learning for Phoneme Perceptioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.