Training-Driven Representational Geometry Modularization Predicts Brain Alignment in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How large language models (LLMs) align with the neural representation and computation of human language is a central question in cognitive science. Using representational geometry as a mechanistic lens, we addressed this by tracking entropy, curvature, and fMRI encoding scores throughout Pythia (70M-1B) training. We identified a geometric modularization where layers self-organize into stable low- and high-complexity clusters. The low-complexity module, characterized by reduced entropy and curvature, consistently better predicted human language network activity. This alignment followed heterogeneous spatial-temporal trajectories: rapid and stable in temporal regions (AntTemp, PostTemp), but delayed and dynamic in frontal areas (IFG, IFGorb). Crucially, reduced curvature remained a robust predictor of model-brain alignment even after controlling for training progress, an effect that strengthened with model scale. These results links training-driven geometric reorganization to temporal-frontal functional specialization, suggesting that representational smoothing facilitates neural-like linguistic processing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2023Large language models implicitly learn to straighten neural sentence trajectories to construct a predictive representation of natural languagecited by 32
- 2025From Language to Cognition: How LLMs Outgrow the Human Language Networkcited by 30
- 2023Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Contextcited by 13
- 2024TopoLM: brain-like spatio-functional organization in a topographic language modelcited by 12
- 2025Far from the Shallow: Brain-Predictive Reasoning Embedding through Residual Disentanglementcited by 4
- 2026A Brain-like Synergistic Core in LLMs Drives Behaviour and Learningcited by 4
- 2025Fine-grained Analysis of Brain-LLM Alignment through Input Attributioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Linguistic properties and model scale in brain encoding: from small to compressed language models
- 2025Brain-Language Model Alignment: Insights into the Platonic Hypothesis and Intermediate-Layer Advantage
- 2026Cross-lingual brain-language model alignment is robust but challenges hierarchical and computational accounts
- 2026Abstract representational geometry supports inference in large language models
- 2026Sparse Autoencoders Map Brain-LLM Alignment onto Cortical Semantic Topography
- 2026The Platonic brain bridge hypothesis: human brain networks as an architectural prior for multimodal large language models
- 2025Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRI
- 2026Abstraction Induces the Brain Alignment of Language and Speech Models