Interpreting Brain Responses to Language with Sparse Features from Language Models
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
A central goal of cognitive neuroscience is to characterize the features that are represented by human language cortex. Artificial language models (LMs) have emerged as a powerful tool to address this challenge, but studies relating biological and artificial representations are often criticized as relating one black box to another. The present work introduces Augmented Sparse Encoding Models, an encoding framework that replaces dense LM hidden states with hierarchically-organized sparse autoencoder (SAE) features, while explicitly including surprisal as a predictor. Using this approach, we (i) produce interpretations of neural responses and (ii) test whether model-brain alignment reflects primary or idiosyncratic variation in LM representations. Using a high-field 7T fMRI dataset of eight participants listening to 200 linguistically diverse sentences, we first validate our modeling framework by recovering previous interpretations of voxel populations tuned to processing difficulty and meaning abstractness. We then interpret a previously-uncharacterized (but reliable) voxel population and find that it is tuned to people-related content. Next, we show that the fronto-temporal human language network is predicted by a common set of features across its constituent regions, but find that frontal regions are relatively well-explained by surprisal alone, even in the absence of LM-based features. Finally, we show that brain responses during language processing are not merely predictable from an arbitrary set of LM features. Rather, brain responses are best explained by the features that tend to capture the most general information encoded in LM representations, suggesting a nontrivial correspondence between brain and LM language representation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 17 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 70 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Sparse Autoencoders Map Brain-LLM Alignment onto Cortical Semantic Topography21 May
- 2026From Atoms to Trees: Building a Structured Feature Forest with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoders12 Feb
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders28 Jan
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
Other references · 13
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
- 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 119
- 2021Low-Dimensional Structure in the Space of Language Representations is Reflected in Brain Responsescited by 34
- 2025From Language to Cognition: How LLMs Outgrow the Human Language Networkcited by 30
- 2022Language models and brains align due to more than next-word prediction and word-level informationcited by 14
- 2023Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Contextcited by 13
- 2024Generative causal testing to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neurosciencecited by 5
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignmentcited by 4
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Linguistic properties and model scale in brain encoding: from small to compressed language models
- 2025Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRI
- 2025Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Language
- 2024What Are Large Language Models Mapping to in the Brain? A Case Against Over-Reliance on Brain Scores
- 2026Computational Lesions in Multilingual Language Models Separate Shared and Language-specific Brain Alignment
- 2026Do Language Models Align with Brains? Prediction Scores Are Not Enough
- 2026Cross-lingual brain-language model alignment is robust but challenges hierarchical and computational accounts
- 2025Brain-Language Model Alignment: Insights into the Platonic Hypothesis and Intermediate-Layer Advantage