fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past decade, studies of naturalistic language processing where participants are scanned while listening to continuous text have flourished. Using word embeddings at first, then large language models, researchers have created encoding models to analyze the brain signals. Presenting these models with the same text as the participants allows to identify brain areas where there is a significant correlation between the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series and the ones predicted by the models' artificial neurons. One intriguing finding from these studies is that they have revealed highly symmetric bilateral activation patterns, somewhat at odds with the well-known left lateralization of language processing. Here, we report analyses of an fMRI dataset where we manipulate the complexity of large language models, testing 28 pretrained models from 8 different families, ranging from 124M to 14.2B parameters. First, we observe that the performance of models in predicting brain responses follows a scaling law, where the fit with brain activity increases linearly with the logarithm of the number of parameters of the model (and its performance on natural language processing tasks). Second, although this effect is present in both hemispheres, it is stronger in the left than in the right hemisphere. Specifically, the left-right difference in brain correlation follows a scaling law with the number of parameters. This finding reconciles computational analyses of brain activity using large language models with the classic observation from aphasic patients showing left hemisphere dominance for language.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.
Builds on
17 of 85 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
- 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
5 more
- 2024Stable LM 2 1.6B Technical Reportcited by 90
- 2023Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRIcited by 68
- 2021Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in the Brain with Deep Networkscited by 40
- 2022Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helpscited by 26
- 2023Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Contextcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025Scaling laws for decoding images from brain activitycited by 22
- 2025Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRIcited by 6
- 2025Probing Neural Topology of Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025A Multimodal Sequence-to-Sequence Model for Cross-Subject Prediction of Brain Responses to Naturalistic Stimulicited by 2
- 2025Vectors from Larger Language Models Predict Human Reading Time and fMRI Data More Poorly when Dimensionality Expansion is Controlledcited by 1
- 2025Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Languagecited by 1
- 2025Scaling and context steer LLMs along the same computational path as the human braincited by 1
- 2026Left-right asymmetry in predicting brain activity from LLMs' representations emerges with their formal linguistic competencecited by 0
- 2026Left-right asymmetry in predicting brain activity from LLMs' representations emerges with their formal linguistic competence13 Feb 2026
- 2025Scaling and context steer LLMs along the same computational path as the human brain1 Dec 2025
- 2025Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Language3 Oct 2025
- 2025A Multimodal Sequence-to-Sequence Model for Cross-Subject Prediction of Brain Responses to Naturalistic Stimuli24 Jul 2025
- 2025Probing Neural Topology of Large Language Models1 Jun 2025
- 2025Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRI28 May 2025
- 2025Vectors from Larger Language Models Predict Human Reading Time and fMRI Data More Poorly when Dimensionality Expansion is Controlled18 May 2025
- 2025Scaling laws for decoding images from brain activity25 Jan 2025