mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Generalize Provably in Learning to Optimize

arXiv 2302.11085 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning to optimize (L2O) has gained increasing popularity, which automates the design of optimizers by data-driven approaches. However, current L2O methods often suffer from poor generalization performance in at least two folds: (i) applying the L2O-learned optimizer to unseen optimizees, in terms of lowering their loss function values (optimizer generalization, or ``generalizable learning of optimizers"); and (ii) the test performance of an optimizee (itself as a machine learning model), trained by the optimizer, in terms of the accuracy over unseen data (optimizee generalization, or ``learning to generalize"). While the optimizer generalization has been recently studied, the optimizee generalization (or learning to generalize) has not been rigorously studied in the L2O context, which is the aim of this paper. We first theoretically establish an implicit connection between the local entropy and the Hessian, and hence unify their roles in the handcrafted design of generalizable optimizers as equivalent metrics of the landscape flatness of loss functions. We then propose to incorporate these two metrics as flatness-aware regularizers into the L2O framework in order to meta-train optimizers to learn to generalize, and theoretically show that such generalization ability can be learned during the L2O meta-training process and then transformed to the optimizee loss function. Extensive experiments consistently validate the effectiveness of our proposals with substantially improved generalization on multiple sophisticated L2O models and diverse optimizees. Our code is available at: https://github.com/VITA-Group/Open-L2O/tree/main/Model_Free_L2O/L2O-Entropy.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2023.

Builds on

46 of 58 references.

References · 46

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
  5. 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  6. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  7. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  8. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
  9. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  10. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  11. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  12. 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 449
34 more
  1. 2019Domain Generalization via Model-Agnostic Learning of Semantic Featurescited by 405
  2. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  3. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
  4. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
  5. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
  6. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
  7. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
  8. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 206
  9. 2016Learning to Optimizecited by 195
  10. 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
  11. 2017Convergence Analysis of Two-layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activationcited by 137
  12. 2020Towards Theoretically Understanding Why SGD Generalizes Better Than ADAM in Deep Learningcited by 125
  13. 2017Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to SGDcited by 121
  14. 2017Learned Optimizers that Scale and Generalizecited by 109
  15. 2018Understanding and correcting pathologies in the training of learned optimizerscited by 97
  16. 2019Asymmetric Valleys: Beyond Sharp and Flat Local Minimacited by 90
  17. 2016The Landscape of Empirical Risk for Non-convex Lossescited by 86
  18. 2017Learning Gradient Descent: Better Generalization and Longer Horizonscited by 50
  19. 2020L2-GCN: Layer-Wise and Learned Efficient Training of Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 48
  20. 2021Understanding the Generalization of Adam in Learning Neural Networks with Proper Regularizationcited by 48
  21. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  22. 2019SGD Converges to Global Minimum in Deep Learning via Star-convex Pathcited by 39
  23. 2020Automated Synthetic-to-Real Generalizationcited by 35
  24. 2020Training Stronger Baselines for Learning to Optimizecited by 31
  25. 2020Using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategiescited by 29
  26. 2019Learning to Optimize in Swarmscited by 23
  27. 2021A Generalizable Approach to Learning Optimizerscited by 23
  28. 2020Improved Adversarial Training via Learned Optimizercited by 22
  29. 2015On the Quality of the Initial Basin in Overspecified Neural Networkscited by 20
  30. 2018Generalization Error Bounds with Probabilistic Guarantee for SGD in Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 14
  31. 2018Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networkscited by 13
  32. 2021Training Learned Optimizers with Randomly Initialized Learned Optimizerscited by 13
  33. 2021Learn2Hop: Learned Optimization on Rough Landscapescited by 12
  34. 2018Minimax Estimation of Neural Net Distancecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

8 papers.