Likelihood Annealing: Fast Calibrated Uncertainty for Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in deep learning have shown that uncertainty estimation is becoming increasingly important in applications such as medical imaging, natural language processing, and autonomous systems. However, accurately quantifying uncertainty remains a challenging problem, especially in regression tasks where the output space is continuous. Deep learning approaches that allow uncertainty estimation for regression problems often converge slowly and yield poorly calibrated uncertainty estimates that can not be effectively used for quantification. Recently proposed post hoc calibration techniques are seldom applicable to regression problems and often add overhead to an already slow model training phase. This work presents a fast calibrated uncertainty estimation method for regression tasks called Likelihood Annealing, that consistently improves the convergence of deep regression models and yields calibrated uncertainty without any post hoc calibration phase. Unlike previous methods for calibrated uncertainty in regression that focus only on low-dimensional regression problems, our method works well on a broad spectrum of regression problems, including high-dimensional regression.Our empirical analysis shows that our approach is generalizable to various network architectures, including multilayer perceptrons, 1D/2D convolutional networks, and graph neural networks, on five vastly diverse tasks, i.e., chaotic particle trajectory denoising, physical property prediction of molecules using 3D atomistic representation, natural image super-resolution, and medical image translation using MRI.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.
Builds on
45 of 77 references.
References · 45
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
33 more
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 341
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 278
- 2018High-Quality Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning: A Distribution-Free, Ensembled Approachcited by 117
- 2020Stochastic Segmentation Networks: Modelling Spatially Correlated Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 100
- 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 88
- 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 85
- 2020Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 77
- 2020ATOM3D: Tasks On Molecules in Three Dimensionscited by 73
- 2016On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Productscited by 52
- 2021Improving Conditional Coverage via Orthogonal Quantile Regressioncited by 48
- 2020Towards Maximizing the Representation Gap between In-Domain & Out-of-Distribution Examplescited by 40
- 2021Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
- 2019TRADI: Tracking deep neural network weight distributions for uncertainty estimationcited by 39
- 2018PIRM Challenge on Perceptual Image Enhancement on Smartphones: Reportcited by 38
- 2020Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 36
- 2022Faithful Heteroscedastic Regression with Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2019Combining Generative and Discriminative Models for Hybrid Inferencecited by 34
- 2021Locally Valid and Discriminative Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning Modelscited by 24
- 2022BayesCap: Bayesian Identity Cap for Calibrated Uncertainty in Frozen Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2021Towards Lower-Dose PET using Physics-Based Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Learning with Robustness to Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 18
- 2021Learning Prediction Intervals for Regression: Generalization and Calibrationcited by 16
- 2021Uncertainty-Guided Progressive GANs for Medical Image Translationcited by 16
- 2021Robustness via Uncertainty-aware Cycle Consistencycited by 16
- 2021Uncertainty-aware GAN with Adaptive Loss for Robust MRI Image Enhancementcited by 15
- 2019Open Set Recognition Through Deep Neural Network Uncertainty: Does Out-of-Distribution Detection Require Generative Classifiers?cited by 13
- 2021Improving Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Multi-Annotated Medical Image Segmentation with Normalizing Flowscited by 13
- 2020Estimating Uncertainty Intervals from Collaborating Networkscited by 10
- 2018Calibrating Uncertainties in Object Localization Taskcited by 9
- 2020PEP: Parameter Ensembling by Perturbationcited by 9
- 2014Robust improper maximum likelihood: tuning, computation, and a comparison with other methods for robust Gaussian clusteringcited by 5
- 2020Parsimonious Quantile Regression of Financial Asset Tail Dynamics via Sequential Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.