mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Multi-Annotated Medical Image Segmentation with Normalizing Flows

arXiv 2108.02155 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantifying uncertainty in medical image segmentation applications is essential, as it is often connected to vital decision-making. Compelling attempts have been made in quantifying the uncertainty in image segmentation architectures, e.g. to learn a density segmentation model conditioned on the input image. Typical work in this field restricts these learnt densities to be strictly Gaussian. In this paper, we propose to use a more flexible approach by introducing Normalizing Flows (NFs), which enables the learnt densities to be more complex and facilitate more accurate modeling for uncertainty. We prove this hypothesis by adopting the Probabilistic U-Net and augmenting the posterior density with an NF, allowing it to be more expressive. Our qualitative as well as quantitative (GED and IoU) evaluations on the multi-annotated and single-annotated LIDC-IDRI and Kvasir-SEG segmentation datasets, respectively, show a clear improvement. This is mostly apparent in the quantification of aleatoric uncertainty and the increased predictive performance of up to 14 percent. This result strongly indicates that a more flexible density model should be seriously considered in architectures that attempt to capture segmentation ambiguity through density modeling. The benefit of this improved modeling will increase human confidence in annotation and segmentation, and enable eager adoption of the technology in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2021.

Builds on

11 of 15 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  6. 2019Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Datasetcited by 588
  7. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
  8. 2019PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 128
  9. 2018Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inferencecited by 71
  10. 2019A Hierarchical Probabilistic U-Net for Modeling Multi-Scale Ambiguitiescited by 65
  11. 2020Uncertainty quantification in medical image segmentation with normalizing flowscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: