mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Fairness in Adaptive Social Exergames via Shapley Bandits

arXiv 2302.09298 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2023cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic fairness is an essential requirement as AI becomes integrated in society. In the case of social applications where AI distributes resources, algorithms often must make decisions that will benefit a subset of users, sometimes repeatedly or exclusively, while attempting to maximize specific outcomes. How should we design such systems to serve users more fairly? This paper explores this question in the case where a group of users works toward a shared goal in a social exergame called Step Heroes. We identify adverse outcomes in traditional multi-armed bandits (MABs) and formalize the Greedy Bandit Problem. We then propose a solution based on a new type of fairness-aware multi-armed bandit, Shapley Bandits. It uses the Shapley Value for increasing overall player participation and intervention adherence rather than the maximization of total group output, which is traditionally achieved by favoring only high-performing participants. We evaluate our approach via a user study (n=46). Our results indicate that our Shapley Bandits effectively mediates the Greedy Bandit Problem and achieves better user retention and motivation across the participants.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2023.

Builds on

23 of 118 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  3. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  6. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  7. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  8. 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
  9. 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
  10. 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  11. 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
  12. 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
11 more
  1. 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 42
  2. 2016A Reinforcement Learning System to Encourage Physical Activity in Diabetes Patientscited by 38
  3. 2020Predictive and Causal Implications of using Shapley Value for Model Interpretationcited by 16
  4. 2020Designing Fair AI for Managing Employees in Organizations: A Review, Critique, and Design Agendacited by 12
  5. 2020Fair Influence Maximization: A Welfare Optimization Approachcited by 12
  6. 2022Towards Involving End-users in Interactive Human-in-the-loop AI Fairnesscited by 12
  7. 2021Player-AI Interaction: What Neural Network Games Reveal About AI as Playcited by 8
  8. 2019Experience Management in Multi-player Gamescited by 3
  9. 2021Player Modeling via Multi-Armed Banditscited by 3
  10. 2021Player-Centered AI for Automatic Game Personalization: Open Problemscited by 3
  11. 2021Personalization Paradox in Behavior Change Apps: Lessons from a Social Comparison-Based Personalized App for Physical Activitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.