mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalization Paradox in Behavior Change Apps: Lessons from a Social Comparison-Based Personalized App for Physical Activity

arXiv 2101.10020 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2021cs.HC cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social comparison-based features are widely used in social computing apps. However, most existing apps are not grounded in social comparison theories and do not consider individual differences in social comparison preferences and reactions. This paper is among the first to automatically personalize social comparison targets. In the context of an m-health app for physical activity, we use artificial intelligence (AI) techniques of multi-armed bandits. Results from our user study (n=53) indicate that there is some evidence that motivation can be increased using the AI-based personalization of social comparison. The detected effects achieved small-to-moderate effect sizes, illustrating the real-world implications of the intervention for enhancing motivation and physical activity. In addition to design implications for social comparison features in social apps, this paper identified the personalization paradox, the conflict between user modeling and adaptation, as a key design challenge of personalized applications for behavior change. Additionally, we propose research directions to mitigate this Personalization Paradox.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2021.

Builds on

2 of 71 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016A Reinforcement Learning System to Encourage Physical Activity in Diabetes Patientscited by 38
  2. 2019Tracing Player Knowledge in a Parallel Programming Educational Gamecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.