Fair Influence Maximization: A Welfare Optimization Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several behavioral, social, and public health interventions, such as suicide/HIV prevention or community preparedness against natural disasters, leverage social network information to maximize outreach. Algorithmic influence maximization techniques have been proposed to aid with the choice of "peer leaders" or "influencers" in such interventions. Yet, traditional algorithms for influence maximization have not been designed with these interventions in mind. As a result, they may disproportionately exclude minority communities from the benefits of the intervention. This has motivated research on fair influence maximization. Existing techniques come with two major drawbacks. First, they require committing to a single fairness measure. Second, these measures are typically imposed as strict constraints leading to undesirable properties such as wastage of resources. To address these shortcomings, we provide a principled characterization of the properties that a fair influence maximization algorithm should satisfy. In particular, we propose a framework based on social welfare theory, wherein the cardinal utilities derived by each community are aggregated using the isoelastic social welfare functions. Under this framework, the trade-off between fairness and efficiency can be controlled by a single inequality aversion design parameter. We then show under what circumstances our proposed principles can be satisfied by a welfare function. The resulting optimization problem is monotone and submodular and can be solved efficiently with optimality guarantees. Our framework encompasses as special cases leximin and proportional fairness. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real world datasets including a case study on landslide risk management demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Fairness in Graph Mining: A Surveycited by 76
- 2022Fairness Amidst Non-IID Graph Data: A Literature Reviewcited by 20
- 2022A Survey on Fairness for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 20
- 2022Graph Learning with Localized Neighborhood Fairnesscited by 10
- 2022Learning Resource Allocation Policies from Observational Data with an Application to Homeless Services Deliverycited by 5
- 2021Fairness-aware Summarization for Justified Decision-Makingcited by 3
- 2023Fairness in Streaming Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraintcited by 3
- 2024Specification Overfitting in Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
- 2024A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learningcited by 2
- 2023Improving Fairness in Adaptive Social Exergames via Shapley Banditscited by 1
- 2025DQ4FairIM: Fairness-aware Influence Maximization using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Price of Fairness in Short-Term and Long-Term Algorithmic Selectionscited by 0
- 2026Price of Fairness in Short-Term and Long-Term Algorithmic Selections7 May 2026
- 2025DQ4FairIM: Fairness-aware Influence Maximization using Deep Reinforcement Learning29 Nov 2025
- 2024A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning16 Jul 2024
- 2024Specification Overfitting in Artificial Intelligence13 Mar 2024
- 2023Fairness in Streaming Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraint24 May 2023
- 2023Improving Fairness in Adaptive Social Exergames via Shapley Bandits18 Feb 2023
- 2022Graph Learning with Localized Neighborhood Fairness22 Dec 2022
- 2022A Survey on Fairness for Machine Learning on Graphs11 May 2022
- 2022Fairness in Graph Mining: A Survey21 Apr 2022
- 2022Fairness Amidst Non-IID Graph Data: A Literature Review15 Feb 2022
- 2022Learning Resource Allocation Policies from Observational Data with an Application to Homeless Services Delivery25 Jan 2022
- 2021Fairness-aware Summarization for Justified Decision-Making13 Jul 2021