Machine Love
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While ML generates much economic value, many of us have problematic relationships with social media and other ML-powered applications. One reason is that ML often optimizes for what we want in the moment, which is easy to quantify but at odds with what is known scientifically about human flourishing. Thus, through its impoverished models of us, ML currently falls far short of its exciting potential, which is for it to help us to reach ours. While there is no consensus on defining human flourishing, from diverse perspectives across psychology, philosophy, and spiritual traditions, love is understood to be one of its primary catalysts. Motivated by this view, this paper explores whether there is a useful conception of love fitting for machines to embody, as historically it has been generative to explore whether a nebulous concept, such as life or intelligence, can be thoughtfully abstracted and reimagined, as in the fields of machine intelligence or artificial life. This paper forwards a candidate conception of machine love, inspired in particular by work in positive psychology and psychotherapy: to provide unconditional support enabling humans to autonomously pursue their own growth and development. Through proof of concept experiments, this paper aims to highlight the need for richer models of human flourishing in ML, provide an example framework through which positive psychology can be combined with ML to realize a rough conception of machine love, and demonstrate that current language models begin to enable embodying qualitative humanistic principles. The conclusion is that though at present ML may often serve to addict, distract, or divide us, an alternative path may be opening up: We may align ML to support our growth, through it helping us to align ourselves towards our highest aspirations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 146 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2023.
Builds on
27 of 146 references.
References · 27
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
15 more
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
- 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
- 2019Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systemscited by 90
- 2018The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communitiescited by 78
- 2022The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimizationcited by 28
- 2018Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Mediacited by 25
- 2022A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AIcited by 20
- 2020Reinforcement Learning Under Moral Uncertaintycited by 16
- 2023Large Language Models as Corporate Lobbyistscited by 13
- 2017Unknowable Manipulators: Social Network Curator Algorithmscited by 2
- 2022The Users Aren't Alright: Dangerous Mental Illness Behaviors and Recommendationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.