Unsupervised Evaluation of Out-of-distribution Detection: A Data-centric Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods assume that they have test ground truths, i.e., whether individual test samples are in-distribution (IND) or OOD. However, in the real world, we do not always have such ground truths, and thus do not know which sample is correctly detected and cannot compute the metric like AUROC to evaluate the performance of different OOD detection methods. In this paper, we are the first to introduce the unsupervised evaluation problem in OOD detection, which aims to evaluate OOD detection methods in real-world changing environments without OOD labels. We propose three methods to compute Gscore as an unsupervised indicator of OOD detection performance. We further introduce a new benchmark Gbench, which has 200 real-world OOD datasets of various label spaces to train and evaluate our method. Through experiments, we find a strong quantitative correlation betwwen Gscore and the OOD detection performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our Gscore achieves state-of-the-art performance. Gscore also generalizes well with different IND/OOD datasets, OOD detection methods, backbones and dataset sizes. We further provide interesting analyses of the effects of backbones and IND/OOD datasets on OOD detection performance. The data and code will be available.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.
Builds on
40 of 62 references.
References · 40
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
28 more
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 490
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
- 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
- 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
- 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2019Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection by Maximum Classifier Discrepancycited by 112
- 2021Semantically Coherent Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 107
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
- 2021Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensemblescited by 54
- 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
- 2021A Framework for Cluster and Classifier Evaluation in the Absence of Reference Labelscited by 16
- 2021Label-Free Model Evaluation with Semi-Structured Dataset Representationscited by 10
- 2022Estimating Model Performance under Domain Shifts with Class-Specific Confidence Scorescited by 10
- 2021Ranking Models in Unlabeled New Environmentscited by 8
- 2022What can we Learn by Predicting Accuracy?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Enhancing Generalization of Universal Adversarial Perturbation through Gradient Aggregationcited by 22
- 2023Classical Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Benchmark in Text Classification Taskscited by 5
- 2024Open-Set Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 3
- 2023Distance Guided Generative Adversarial Network for Explainable Binary Classificationscited by 0
- 2024Open-Set Facial Expression Recognition23 Jan 2024
- 2023Distance Guided Generative Adversarial Network for Explainable Binary Classifications29 Dec 2023
- 2023Enhancing Generalization of Universal Adversarial Perturbation through Gradient Aggregation11 Aug 2023
- 2023Classical Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Benchmark in Text Classification Tasks13 Jul 2023