mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Framework for Cluster and Classifier Evaluation in the Absence of Reference Labels

arXiv 2109.11126 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.CRcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In some problem spaces, the high cost of obtaining ground truth labels necessitates use of lower quality reference datasets. It is difficult to benchmark model performance using these datasets, as evaluation results may be biased. We propose a supplement to using reference labels, which we call an approximate ground truth refinement (AGTR). Using an AGTR, we prove that bounds on specific metrics used to evaluate clustering algorithms and multi-class classifiers can be computed without reference labels. We also introduce a procedure that uses an AGTR to identify inaccurate evaluation results produced from datasets of dubious quality. Creating an AGTR requires domain knowledge, and malware family classification is a task with robust domain knowledge approaches that support the construction of an AGTR. We demonstrate our AGTR evaluation framework by applying it to a popular malware labeling tool to diagnose over-fitting in prior testing and evaluate changes whose impact could not be meaningfully quantified under previous data.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.

Builds on

13 of 58 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  2. 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
  3. 2018EMBER: An Open Dataset for Training Static PE Malware Machine Learning Modelscited by 164
  4. 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 116
  5. 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
  6. 2019A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning Researchcited by 77
  7. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 70
  8. 2019Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicatescited by 61
  9. 2018Microsoft Malware Classification Challengecited by 46
  10. 2020A Survey of Machine Learning Methods and Challenges for Windows Malware Classificationcited by 33
  11. 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
  12. 2021Leveraging Uncertainty for Improved Static Malware Detection Under Extreme False Positive Constraintscited by 11
1 more
  1. 2013Unveiling Zeuscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
  2. 2021MOTIF: A Large Malware Reference Dataset with Ground Truth Family Labelscited by 17
  3. 2023SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 13
  4. 2024Assemblage: Automatic Binary Dataset Construction for Machine Learningcited by 12
  5. 2022The Cross-evaluation of Machine Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 8
  6. 2022Efficient Malware Analysis Using Metric Embeddingscited by 6
  7. 2024Is Function Similarity Over-Engineered? Building a Benchmarkcited by 6
  8. 2023Unsupervised Evaluation of Out-of-distribution Detection: A Data-centric Perspectivecited by 4
  9. 2021Logical Assessment Formula and Its Principles for Evaluations with Inaccurate Ground-Truth Labelscited by 3
  10. 2024Living off the Analyst: Harvesting Features from Yara Rules for Malware Detectioncited by 3
  11. 2025Zipf-Gramming: Scaling Byte N-Grams Up to Production Sized Malware Corporacited by 2
  12. 2026Cybersecurity is the True Frontier for Generative AI Success or Failurecited by 2
4 more
  1. 2022Firenze: Model Evaluation Using Weak Signalscited by 0
  2. 2023Validation of the Practicability of Logical Assessment Formula for Evaluations with Inaccurate Ground-Truth Labels: An Application Study on Tumour Segmentation for Breast Cancercited by 0
  3. 2023High-resolution Image-based Malware Classification using Multiple Instance Learningcited by 0
  4. 2026Hamm-Grams: An Algorithm for Mining Regular Expressions of Bytescited by 0