mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learning

arXiv 1511.00148 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2015cs.CY stat.APcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, many decisions are made using predictive models built on historical data.Predictive models may systematically discriminate groups of people even if the computing process is fair and well-intentioned. Discrimination-aware data mining studies how to make predictive models free from discrimination, when historical data, on which they are built, may be biased, incomplete, or even contain past discriminatory decisions. Discrimination refers to disadvantageous treatment of a person based on belonging to a category rather than on individual merit. In this survey we review and organize various discrimination measures that have been used for measuring discrimination in data, as well as in evaluating performance of discrimination-aware predictive models. We also discuss related measures from other disciplines, which have not been used for measuring discrimination, but potentially could be suitable for this purpose. We computationally analyze properties of selected measures. We also review and discuss measuring procedures, and present recommendations for practitioners. The primary target audience is data mining, machine learning, pattern recognition, statistical modeling researchers developing new methods for non-discriminatory predictive modeling. In addition, practitioners and policy makers would use the survey for diagnosing potential discrimination by predictive models.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: