Graph schemas as abstractions for transfer learning, inference, and planning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transferring latent structure from one environment or problem to another is a mechanism by which humans and animals generalize with very little data. Inspired by cognitive and neurobiological insights, we propose graph schemas as a mechanism of abstraction for transfer learning. Graph schemas start with latent graph learning where perceptually aliased observations are disambiguated in the latent space using contextual information. Latent graph learning is also emerging as a new computational model of the hippocampus to explain map learning and transitive inference. Our insight is that a latent graph can be treated as a flexible template -- a schema -- that models concepts and behaviors, with slots that bind groups of latent nodes to the specific observations or groundings. By treating learned latent graphs (schemas) as prior knowledge, new environments can be quickly learned as compositions of schemas and their newly learned bindings. We evaluate graph schemas on two previously published challenging tasks: the memory & planning game and one-shot StreetLearn, which are designed to test rapid task solving in novel environments. Graph schemas can be learned in far fewer episodes than previous baselines, and can model and plan in a few steps in novel variations of these tasks. We also demonstrate learning, matching, and reusing graph schemas in more challenging 2D and 3D environments with extensive perceptual aliasing and size variations, and show how different schemas can be composed to model larger and more complex environments. To summarize, our main contribution is a unified system, inspired and grounded in cognitive science, that facilitates rapid transfer learning of new environments using schemas via map-induction and composition that handles perceptual aliasing.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2023.
Builds on
25 of 48 references.
References · 25
- 2019Efficient Off-Policy Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Context Variablescited by 389
- 2016Learning to reinforcement learncited by 377
- 2017Cognitive Mapping and Planning for Visual Navigationcited by 212
- 2018Semi-parametric Topological Memory for Navigationcited by 209
- 2019Search on the Replay Buffer: Bridging Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 194
- 2018Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 133
- 2018Deep Variational Reinforcement Learning for POMDPscited by 125
- 2021Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPscited by 122
- 2021Abstraction and Analogy-Making in Artificial Intelligencecited by 103
- 2016DeepMind Labcited by 74
- 2020World Model as a Graph: Learning Latent Landmarks for Planningcited by 69
- 2019Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RLcited by 66
13 more
- 2021Relating transformers to models and neural representations of the hippocampal formationcited by 62
- 2020Emergent Symbols through Binding in External Memorycited by 47
- 2019The StreetLearn Environment and Datasetcited by 42
- 2021Towards mental time travel: a hierarchical memory for reinforcement learning agentscited by 40
- 2018Modeling Perceptual Aliasing in SLAM via Discrete-Continuous Graphical Modelscited by 24
- 2020Rapid Task-Solving in Novel Environmentscited by 23
- 2022Abstraction for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2015Representing higher-order dependencies in networkscited by 10
- 2019Learning higher-order sequential structure with cloned HMMscited by 10
- 2017Learning Overcomplete HMMscited by 9
- 2021Map Induction: Compositional spatial submap learning for efficient exploration in novel environmentscited by 9
- 2020Neural Analogical Matchingcited by 7
- 2022Space is a latent sequence: Structured sequence learning as a unified theory of representation in the hippocampuscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Schema-learning and rebinding as mechanisms of in-context learning and emergencecited by 14
- 2024Learning Cognitive Maps from Transformer Representations for Efficient Planning in Partially Observed Environmentscited by 6
- 2024Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agentscited by 5
- 2025Schema for In-Context Learningcited by 4
- 2024Learning Dynamic Cognitive Map with Autonomous Navigationcited by 3
- 2024Free Energy Projective Simulation (FEPS): Active inference with interpretabilitycited by 2
- 2023Learning Successor Features with Distributed Hebbian Temporal Memorycited by 1
- 2025Schema for In-Context Learning14 Oct 2025
- 2024Free Energy Projective Simulation (FEPS): Active inference with interpretability22 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning Dynamic Cognitive Map with Autonomous Navigation13 Nov 2024
- 2024Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agents12 Aug 2024
- 2024Learning Cognitive Maps from Transformer Representations for Efficient Planning in Partially Observed Environments11 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning Successor Features with Distributed Hebbian Temporal Memory20 Oct 2023
- 2023Schema-learning and rebinding as mechanisms of in-context learning and emergence16 Jun 2023